Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rterakedis/leanwheel-skills --skill statusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rterakedis/leanwheel-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/status/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/status.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00394 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00197 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 36 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 3e1ef9fdd918
status is a skill published in the GitHub repository rterakedis/leanwheel-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), with no licence file. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 394 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
engagement-scoping
Resolve the documentation engagement scope from the settings cascade — project identity, source roots, output root, delivery mode, action ceiling, confidentiality default, and the exact file set this run may touch — and freeze it to /00-control/.scope.json. Use when any /dossier: command starts, when the delivery mode…
finding-reconciliation
Merge the independent A/B/C findings tables into one adjudicated ledger in 07-verification/documentation-verification-report.md — normalizing to the finding schema, deduplicating by location and claim, recording per-finding corroboration without downgrading single-pass findings, promoting cross-pass disagreement to…
gap-and-contradiction-register
Maintain 00-control/assumptions-questions-and-contradictions.md — the assumptions and open-questions register (AQ-####) and the contradiction register (CT-####) — classifying each entry as blocking, material but non-blocking, or minor, and routing blocking gaps to owner resolution before drafting proceeds. Use when a…
project-modeling
Build one canonical project model — entities, boundaries, owners, lifecycle state, and end-to-end traces — and record its authoritative names in 00-control/terminology-and-ownership.md (TM-####), then project that single model into every audience view without ever forking it. Use when starting Phase 2, when the…
scoring-and-release-gate
Score a documentation package against the ten-dimension weighted rubric in references/scorecard-rubric.md with a cited justification per dimension, then evaluate the nineteen conditions in references/release-gate-conditions.md and emit a binary release-ready, conditionally-ready, or not-ready verdict with…
goal-contract-capture
Capture a FlowGoal contract as .flow/goals/ .goal.yaml — outcome, acceptance criteria with verification commands, specification (non-goals, failure modes, interface contracts, risk map), constraints, evaluator binding, continuation policy, lifecycle. Use when /flow:start passes the Spec Validation Gate, when…