Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ruvnet/dynamo-mcp --skill evolvegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruvnet/dynamo-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruvnet/dynamo-mcp/evolve)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruvnet/dynamo-mcp/evolve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ruvnet/dynamo-mcp/evolve/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruvnet/dynamo-mcp/evolve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ruvnet/dynamo-mcp/evolve.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00155 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
evolve scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to evolve — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Run npm run bench:generate and npm run bench:verify from this package. The generated suite reflects repository tests; public, hidden and regression labels do not establish independent evaluation sets. Use a separately designed held out task set to support improvement claims.
npm run evolve uses the upstream real sandbox with repository tests. Upstream warns this substrate may score all mutated surfaces identically. npm run evolve:dry uses mock scores and is only a mechanics check. Neither proves improved agent capability. Configure the agent substrate and an explicit budget before model backed optimization. A successful gate is not permission to publish, deploy or merge beyond existing user authorization. Keep rollback evidence and reject regressions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 9 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A cb865def66ff
evolve is a skill published in the GitHub repository ruvnet/dynamo-mcp (53 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 155 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to evolve, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.