Ruflo is an execution and coordination layer for Claude Code and Codex that equips AI coding agents with tools, memory, control loops, sandboxes, and collaboration mechanisms. Developers use it to organize specialized agents into swarms, coordinate workflows, retain knowledge across sessions, and communicate across machines. The catalogue entries are Ruflo’s skills, commands, agents, hooks, and plugin components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ruvnet/ruflo/claimsnpx skills add ruvnet/ruflo --skill claimsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruvnet/rufloWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruvnet/ruflo/claims)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruvnet/ruflo/claims"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ruvnet/ruflo/claims.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00407 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
claims scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Claims Authorization Skill
Purpose
Claims-based authorization for secure agent operations and access control.
Claim Types
| Claim | Description |
|---|---|
read |
Read file access |
write |
Write file access |
execute |
Command execution |
spawn |
Agent spawning |
memory |
Memory access |
network |
Network access |
admin |
Administrative operations |
Commands
Check Claim
npx claude-flow claims check --agent agent-123 --claim write
Grant Claim
npx claude-flow claims grant --agent agent-123 --claim write --scope "/src/**"
Revoke Claim
npx claude-flow claims revoke --agent agent-123 --claim write
List Claims
npx claude-flow claims list --agent agent-123
Scope Patterns
| Pattern | Description |
|---|---|
* |
All resources |
/src/** |
All files in src |
/config/*.toml |
TOML files in config |
memory:patterns |
Patterns namespace |
Security Levels
| Level | Claims |
|---|---|
minimal |
read only |
standard |
read, write, execute |
elevated |
+ spawn, memory |
admin |
all claims |
Best Practices
- Follow principle of least privilege
- Scope claims to specific resources
- Audit claim usage regularly
- Revoke claims when no longer needed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 71 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 589b4b8c1af8
claims is a skill published in the GitHub repository ruvnet/ruflo (70,498 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 407 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
external-memory-plugin
Develop, adapt, review, test, and troubleshoot Nexent external memory provider plugins, including plugin.yaml manifests, searchable and ingestible provider protocols, error mapping, network-isolated unit tests, deployment configuration, and Mem0-based examples. Use when adding a new external memory vendor, changing an…
nw-design
Designs system architecture with C4 diagrams and technology selection. Routes to the right architect based on design scope (system, domain, application, or full stack). Two interaction modes: guide (collaborative Q&A) or propose (architect presents options with trade-offs).
compare-harnesses
Diff two scaffolded harnesses (ADR-031). Reports manifest meta drift + host list + per-file fingerprint changes (added/removed/changed). Exits 0 IDENTICAL, 1 DRIFT, 2 missing manifest. Use --bundle for the ADR-031 schema-1 JSON envelope.
diag-harness
Kernel-version skew check (ADR-027). Reports manifest surface + manifest kernel + installed kernel + verdict (match/patch-diff/minor-diff/major-diff). Exits 1 on minor/major skew with a copy-pasteable npm install @metaharness/[email protected] next step. Exits 2 if no .harness/manifest.json at path.
repo-genome
7-section readiness scorecard for a LOCAL repo. Reports repo type + agent topology + MCP risk + test confidence + release readiness + recommended harness plan + scorecard. Exit 0 ready, 1 needs-work, 2 blocked. --json for the 6-field scorecard, --bundle for the ADR-031 schema-1 envelope.
score-harness
5-dimension scorecard (0-100, grade A/B/C/F) for a scaffolded harness. Dimensions: Repo understanding (25%), Agent usefulness (25%), MCP safety (20%), Test coverage (15%), Publish readiness (15%). Emits a 6-field badges block (score + mcpRisk + 4 booleans) ready for the harness README. Exit 0 A/B, 1 C, 2 F.