Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/saadshahd/moo.md/reframenpx skills add saadshahd/moo.md --skill reframegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saadshahd/moo.mdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saadshahd/moo.md/reframe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saadshahd/moo.md/reframe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saadshahd/moo.md/reframe.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00592 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00296 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
reframe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 45 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Extract
From the conversation/context/user:
- The framing as stated — the sentence or question the problem currently lives in.
- Its bind — how every option inside it loses: the either/or where each side loses, the question that resists every answer.
- Its origin — whether the frame arrived with the problem or the user chose it.
Gate
Proceed only when: the bind is real — every option inside the framing loses, or the question resists every answer — and the frame is not a choice the user already made.
Anything else, say which in one plain line — never reframe anyway:
- An option inside the framing can actually win → the frame holds; answer inside it and proceed with what the answer settles.
- The user chose the frame and wants an answer inside it → answer inside it and proceed with what the answer settles.
- Something exists inside the frame and a claim about it needs a committed verdict → use judge skill.
- The frame is fine and the user is missing something already settled → use explain skill.
Rework
Everything here, the retry included, runs inside this one turn — nothing waits on the user.
- Name what the current framing fixes: its subject, its level, its scope.
- Change exactly one and state the problem again with that one change — one plain sentence. Where more than one change would do, prefer the statement that makes the stuck options irrelevant over the one that picks between them.
- Test the new statement before delivering anything: if it names the same subject at the same level, it is the old frame in new words — discard it, change a different one of the three, and state and test once more. If the second statement fails the same test, the framing resists reframing — carry that verdict out as the result instead of a statement.
Output
The new statement is the result — deliver it, with one line on what it frees that the old framing blocked. Stop there: a statement of the problem to work from, not a solution. Stating the problem again is the whole act — solving it runs on the new statement, after this turn, never inside it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 45 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 82cc522d7e74
reframe is a skill published in the GitHub repository saadshahd/moo.md (34 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 592 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
lark-sheets
飞书电子表格：创建和操作电子表格。支持创建表格、管理工作表与行列结构（增删/合并/调整尺寸/隐藏/冻结）、读写单元格（值/公式/样式/批注/单元格图片）、查找替换、多操作原子批量更新，以及图表、透视表、条件格式、筛选器、迷你图、浮动图片等对象的创建与维护。当用户需要创建电子表格、管理工作表、批量读写或编辑数据、统计汇总与可视化、表格美化、公式计算（含 Excel 公式迁移）、金融/财务建模（DCF、三张表、预算、Sensitivity 等）等任务时使用。若用户是想按名称或关键词搜索云空间（云盘/云存储）里的表格文件，请改用 lark-drive 的 drive +search 先定位资源。当用户给出 doubao.com 的…
lark-slides
飞书幻灯片：创建和编辑幻灯片。创建演示文稿、读取幻灯片内容、管理幻灯片页面（创建、删除、读取、局部替换）。当用户需要创建或编辑幻灯片、读取或修改单个页面时使用。当用户给出 doubao.com 的 /slides/ URL/token 时，也应直接使用本 skill，不要因为域名不是飞书而回退到 WebFetch；路由依据是 URL 路径模式和 token，而不是域名。不负责：云文档内容编辑（走 lark-doc）、云文档里的独立画板对象（走 lark-whiteboard）、上传或下载普通文件（走 lark-drive）。.
lark-vc-agent
飞书视频会议会中能力：用于让应用机器人真实加入或离开正在进行的会议，并读取当前身份可见的会中事件、发送会中文本消息或会中表情。适用于用户询问正在开的会议发生了什么、谁在发言、是否共享内容，或需要发现当前可读的进行中会议 ID。不负责已结束会议搜索、参会人快照、纪要、逐字稿或录制查询，这些使用 lark-vc 技能。.
lark-vc
飞书视频会议：搜索历史会议记录、查询会议纪要（总结/待办/章节/逐字稿）、查询参会人快照。当用户查询已结束的会议、获取会议产物（纪要/妙记）、查看参会人时使用；查询未来日程走 lark-calendar。不负责：Agent 真实入会/离会、会中实时事件（走 lark-vc-agent）。.
session-recap
Document Claude Code sessions by extracting knowledge into cross-referenced documentation. Triggers on "recap the session", "summarize the work", or after significant code changes.
lark-minutes
飞书妙记：搜索妙记、查看妙记基础信息、下载/上传音视频、读取或编辑妙记的产物内容、改标题、替换说话人/关键词、申请妙记查看/编辑权限。当给出minutetoken、本地音视频文件，要查/改/转妙记产物，或用户明确要主动申请妙记权限时使用；本地音视频转纪要/逐字稿优先走本 skill，不要用 ffmpeg/whisper 本地转写。不负责：获取会议关联妙记，或仅按自然语言标题定位纪要.