Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Saba-Burduli/CodexAgentMonitor. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Saba-Burduli/CodexAgentMonitor/main/.agents/skills/targeted-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Saba-Burduli/CodexAgentMonitorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saba-burduli/codexagentmonitor/targeted-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saba-burduli/codexagentmonitor/targeted-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saba-burduli/codexagentmonitor/targeted-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saba-burduli/codexagentmonitor/targeted-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saba-burduli/codexagentmonitor/targeted-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00146 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00058 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
targeted-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 18 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 27a66a72cc4c
targeted-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Saba-Burduli/CodexAgentMonitor (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 146 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-code
Review code changes for correctness defects, regressions, security risks, data-integrity problems, concurrency hazards, and missing meaningful tests. Use for pull requests, branches, commits, patches, or working-tree reviews; do not use for implementation unless the user separately requests fixes.
review-security
Review application and infrastructure changes for exploitable security risks by tracing assets, trust boundaries, attacker-controlled input, authorization, sensitive data, and dangerous sinks. Use for security reviews, threat-focused PR reviews, authentication or authorization changes, input handling, secrets…
evidence-review
Review a small code or documentation change and return only evidence-backed correctness findings. Use in the Codex How To local plugin lab; do not modify files or post remote comments.
review-agent
Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.
agent-skill-release-review
Review a Codex, Claude Code, or agent skill/plugin before public release. Use when the user wants to assess trigger quality, folder structure, documentation, validation gaps, GitHub readiness, or OSS release quality for an agent extension.
iac-reviewer
Review infrastructure-as-code changes for safety and correctness. Use when a mid-level developer needs a second look on IaC.