Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add sabahudin-web/competitive-intelligence-radar/plugin install competitive-intelligence-radarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sabahudin-web/competitive-intelligence-radar/radar-merge-briefing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sabahudin-web/competitive-intelligence-radar/radar-merge-briefing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sabahudin-web/competitive-intelligence-radar/radar-merge-briefing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sabahudin-web/competitive-intelligence-radar/radar-merge-briefing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sabahudin-web/competitive-intelligence-radar/radar-merge-briefing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.01216 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00608 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00243 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
radar-merge-briefing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
radar-merge-briefing
Automation level: AUTONOMOUS.
Goal: produce the single source of truth for this run on local disk, with a source URL on every claim and no fabricated or stale-as-fresh values.
Steps
-
Inputs from the caller: the run date, the run dossier directory, and the change set from
radar-diff-changes. Readradar.config.jsonfor business name, keywords, and freshness windows. -
Load every dossier in the run directory.
-
Render the briefing markdown from the template at
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/assets/briefing-template.md. Fill every placeholder. For each competitor field, write the value, its source link, the fetched date, and the status. Where a field isnot_foundorblocked, say so plainly rather than leaving a gap or inventing a value. Build the "What changed" and "Focus list" sections from the ranked change set. -
Enforce the rules as you write:
- No claim without a source (no-fabrication.md).
- Label freshness per section (freshness.md).
- No em or en dashes (no-em-dashes.md); normalize any in quotes.
-
Write three files:
- Briefing markdown:
outputs/briefings/<YYYY-MM-DD>-briefing.md - Combined raw dossier JSON:
outputs/dossiers/<YYYY-MM-DD>/combined.json(all dossiers plus the change set, the machine-readable record). - Dashboard data JSON:
outputs/dashboard/<YYYY-MM-DD>-data.json, shaped for the dashboard template (see the shape below).war_roomis null until/radar-councilfills it.
- Briefing markdown:
-
Update
radar.config.jsonlast_runwith the new paths and date, and roll the previous run's dossier dir so the next diff has a baseline.
Dashboard data JSON shape
The dashboard at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/assets/dashboard-template.html reads this exact shape. The
template computes missing KPIs itself, but populate kpis so the numbers match the briefing. SERP
rank values MUST be numbers (not strings) so the leaderboard renders. Sentiment values are one of
positive, mixed, negative, unknown. Each change carries a type
(RISING, FALLING, PRICE, NEWS, NEW, STEADY) and the competitor name.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 90 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3e5fab58acca
radar-merge-briefing is a skill published in the GitHub repository sabahudin-web/competitive-intelligence-radar (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,216 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
falsify
Adversarial falsification of sigint research findings. Generates disconfirming queries, executes web-only adversarial search, assigns ordinal verdicts (falsified | weakened | survived | inconclusive), and applies remediation (quarantine, confidence downgrade, follow-up queue). Invocable standalone via /sigint:falsify…
regulatory-review
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze regulations", "regulatory landscape", "compliance requirements", "legal considerations", "regulatory risk", "industry regulations", "compliance analysis", "regulatory trends", or needs guidance on understanding regulatory environments, compliance requirements…
report-writing
This skill should be used when the user asks to "write a report", "executive summary", "research report format", "report structure", "present findings", "business writing", "analysis documentation", or needs guidance on structuring research outputs, executive communication, or professional report formatting.
tech-assessment
This skill should be used when the user asks to "assess technology", "technology evaluation", "tech stack analysis", "technical feasibility", "technology trends", "build vs buy", "technology roadmap", "architecture assessment", or needs guidance on evaluating technologies, technical due diligence, or technology…
augment
Deep-dive into a specific area of current research. Orchestrates a single dimension-analyst using full swarm pattern (TeamCreate, TaskCreate, SendMessage). Use when the user wants to augment current research with deeper analysis of a specific area.
market-sizing
This skill should be used when the user asks to "calculate market size", "TAM SAM SOM analysis", "estimate market opportunity", "market sizing", "total addressable market", "serviceable market", "market potential", or needs guidance on market size estimation methodologies, market opportunity calculations, or growth…