Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add safubuki/skills-generator --skill example-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/safubuki/skills-generatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/safubuki/skills-generator/example-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/safubuki/skills-generator/example-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/safubuki/skills-generator/example-skill.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.00434 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00217 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Skill
When to Use
- プルリクエストのコードレビューを依頼されたとき
- 自分のコードの品質チェックをしたいとき
- リファクタリング対象を特定したいとき
概要
コードを 品質・セキュリティ・パフォーマンス・保守性 の4つの観点でレビューし、 重要度別に改善提案をまとめて出力します。
手順
Step 1: 対象の特定
レビュー対象のファイルまたは変更差分を確認する。
Step 2: 4つの観点でレビュー
| 観点 | チェック内容 |
|---|---|
| 品質 | 命名、構造、DRY原則、エラーハンドリング |
| セキュリティ | 入力検証、認証、機密情報の露出 |
| パフォーマンス | 不要な再レンダリング、N+1、メモリリーク |
| 保守性 | テスタビリティ、ドキュメント、複雑度 |
Step 3: レポート出力
📄 assets/review-template.md のテンプレートに従って出力。
参照ドキュメント
- assets/review-template.md — レビューレポートテンプレート
- references/review-checklist.md — 詳細チェックリスト
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 42 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 522e8b3bc4f5
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository safubuki/skills-generator (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 434 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…