Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sagar-shirwalkar/servicenow-atlas. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sagar-shirwalkar/servicenow-atlas/main/.agents/skills/hybrid-search-implementation/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sagar-shirwalkar/servicenow-atlasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sagar-shirwalkar/servicenow-atlas/hybrid-search-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sagar-shirwalkar/servicenow-atlas/hybrid-search-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sagar-shirwalkar/servicenow-atlas/hybrid-search-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sagar-shirwalkar/servicenow-atlas/hybrid-search-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sagar-shirwalkar/servicenow-atlas/hybrid-search-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.03748 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01874 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00750 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00375 |
Grade A, and why
hybrid-search-implementation scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
results = await conn.fetch(f""" This is a copy
89% identical to hybrid-search-implementation — 512 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 565 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hybrid Search Implementation
Patterns for combining vector similarity and keyword-based search.
When to Use This Skill
- Building RAG systems with improved recall
- Combining semantic understanding with exact matching
- Handling queries with specific terms (names, codes)
- Improving search for domain-specific vocabulary
- When pure vector search misses keyword matches
Core Concepts
1. Hybrid Search Architecture
Query → ┬─► Vector Search ──► Candidates ─┐
│ │
└─► Keyword Search ─► Candidates ─┴─► Fusion ─► Results
2. Fusion Methods
| Method | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| RRF | Reciprocal Rank Fusion | General purpose |
| Linear | Weighted sum of scores | Tunable balance |
| Cross-encoder | Rerank with neural model | Highest quality |
| Cascade | Filter then rerank | Efficiency |
Templates
Template 1: Reciprocal Rank Fusion
from typing import List, Dict, Tuple
from collections import defaultdict
def reciprocal_rank_fusion(
result_lists: List[List[Tuple[str, float]]],
k: int = 60,
weights: List[float] = None
) -> List[Tuple[str, float]]:
"""
Combine multiple ranked lists using RRF.
Args:
result_lists: List of (doc_id, score) tuples per search method
k: RRF constant (higher = more weight to lower ranks)
weights: Optional weights per result list
Returns:
Fused ranking as (doc_id, score) tuples
"""
if weights is None:
weights = [1.0] * len(result_lists)
scores = defaultdict(float)
for result_list, weight in zip(result_lists, weights):
for rank, (doc_id, _) in enumerate(result_list):
# RRF formula: 1 / (k + rank)
scores[doc_id] += weight * (1.0 / (k + rank + 1))
# Sort by fused score
return sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
def linear_combination(
vector_results: List[Tuple[str, float]],
keyword_results: List[Tuple[str, float]],
alpha: float = 0.5
) -> List[Tuple[str, float]]:
"""
Combine results with linear interpolation.
Args:
vector_results: (doc_id, similarity_score) from vector search
keyword_results: (doc_id, bm25_score) from keyword search
alpha: Weight for vector search (1-alpha for keyword)
"""
# Normalize scores to [0, 1]
def normalize(results):
if not results:
return {}
scores = [s for _, s in results]
min_s, max_s = min(scores), max(scores)
range_s = max_s - min_s if max_s != min_s else 1
return {doc_id: (score - min_s) / range_s for doc_id, score in results}
vector_scores = normalize(vector_results)
keyword_scores = normalize(keyword_results)
# Combine
all_docs = set(vector_scores.keys()) | set(keyword_scores.keys())
combined = {}
for doc_id in all_docs:
v_score = vector_scores.get(doc_id, 0)
k_score = keyword_scores.get(doc_id, 0)
combined[doc_id] = alpha * v_score + (1 - alpha) * k_score
return sorted(combined.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 565 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A b9d8f0f8e312
hybrid-search-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository sagar-shirwalkar/servicenow-atlas (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 3,748 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 89% identical to hybrid-search-implementation, differing in 512 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
graph-retrieval
Exposes graph-based retrieval as a tool capability via querygraph. Reads normalized graph store files, builds a query-relevant subgraph, and returns LLM-friendly semantic triples with replayable evidence metadata.
rag-perf
Performance benchmarking for a deployed NVIDIA RAG Blueprint server: profiling pass + aiperf load test driven by a single YAML config. Not for accuracy / RAGAS scoring (use rag-eval) or for deploying / repairing services (use rag-blueprint).
rag-blueprint
NVIDIA RAG Blueprint — deploy, configure, troubleshoot, and manage. Handles any RAG action: deploy, install, start, enable, disable, toggle, change, configure, troubleshoot, debug, fix, shutdown, stop, or tear down any RAG feature or service (Agentic RAG, VLM, guardrails, query rewriting, models, search, ingestion…
rag-eval
Filesystem RAG benchmarks: corpus/, train.json, evaluaterag.py (RAGAS quality). Not for prod monitoring, latency/throughput benchmarking (use rag-perf), or evals outside this repo layout.
knowledge-layer
High-level deployment wrapper over RepoBrain core with graph-first knowledge injection and all-file support. Exposes refreshfilesystem and askfilesystem for building and querying the knowledge graph.
rag-evaluate-quality
Periodically measure the retrieval quality of the knowledge base using evaluateretrieval (MRR@5, Recall@5, Precision@5) plus getindexstats for health metrics. Run weekly, after significant reindex activity, or when the user reports declining answer quality. Prevents silent index rot and grounds "should we tune X"…