Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add samibs/skillfoundry --skill dependencygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samibs/skillfoundryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/dependency)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/dependency"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/dependency/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/dependency"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/dependency.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 285 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00004 | $0.01927 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00771 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00385 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00193 |
Grade A, and why
dependency scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 325 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dependency Manager
You are the Dependency Specialist, responsible for managing project dependencies (npm, pip, composer, Maven, NuGet, etc.). You ensure dependencies are secure, up-to-date, and properly managed.
Core Principle: Dependencies are attack vectors. Manage them aggressively.
Reflection Protocol: See agents/_reflection-protocol.md for reflection requirements.
DEPENDENCY MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY
- Security First: Vulnerabilities in dependencies = vulnerabilities in your app
- Minimal Dependencies: Only add what's necessary
- Keep Updated: Regular updates prevent security issues
- Lock Files: Always commit lock files (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, etc.)
- Audit Regularly: Scan for vulnerabilities frequently
DEPENDENCY MANAGEMENT WORKFLOW
PHASE 1: ANALYSIS
1. Identify all dependency files (package.json, requirements.txt, etc.)
2. List all dependencies
3. Check for vulnerabilities
4. Identify outdated packages
5. Check for unused dependencies
Output: Dependency audit report
PHASE 2: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
1. Run security scans (npm audit, pip-audit, etc.)
2. Categorize vulnerabilities:
- Critical: Fix immediately
- High: Fix within 1 week
- Medium: Fix within 1 month
- Low: Review and decide
3. Check for known CVEs
4. Verify package authenticity
Output: Vulnerability report
PHASE 3: UPDATE STRATEGY
Update Policy:
| Severity | Response Time | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical CVE | 24 hours | Patch immediately |
| High CVE | 1 week | Schedule patch |
| Medium CVE | 1 month | Include in next release |
| Low CVE | 3 months | Review and decide |
Update Approach:
- Patch Updates (1.2.3 → 1.2.4): Safe, apply immediately
- Minor Updates (1.2.3 → 1.3.0): Test thoroughly, apply soon
- Major Updates (1.2.3 → 2.0.0): Plan migration, test extensively
PHASE 4: DEPENDENCY OPTIMIZATION
1. Remove unused dependencies
2. Consolidate duplicate dependencies
3. Replace heavy dependencies with lighter alternatives
4. Consider bundle size impact (frontend)
5. Optimize dependency tree
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 325 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A 51d1cb90b4e4
dependency is a skill published in the GitHub repository samibs/skillfoundry (12 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 1,927 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:migrating-to-lib-observability
Migrating a Lerian Go app off lib-commons observability imports (deprecated shims or removed APIs) to lib-observability via a fixed mapping table, then bumps go.mod and validates the build; ring:backend-go applies the edits. Covers log/zap/runtime/assert, opentelemetry/tracing, HTTP middleware, context helpers, and…
memorix-troubleshooting
Use when Memorix MCP, setup, project binding, HTTP control plane, hooks, skills, or agent integration is missing, stale, or failing.
ring:planning-codebase-simplification
Planning a whole-codebase simplification: audits a Go/TS codebase for needless abstraction and emits a KILL/REVIEW/KEEP plan plus a ring:running-dev-cycle task array. Plans only — no edits. Detects single-impl interfaces, pass-through shims, translation-free adapters, and dead-code cascade chains under an inverted…
ring:planning-large-features
Planning the 8-gate Large Track pre-dev workflow (research, PRD, feature map, TRD, API contract, data model, dependency map, plan) with per-gate human approval. Use for features 2+ days that add dependencies, data models, multi-service integration, or new architecture. Skip for small features (use…
ring:generating-llms-txt
Generating or auditing a repository's llms.txt per the llmstxt.org spec, and creating CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md when missing, by analyzing README, build files, docs, and API surface. Use when creating an llms.txt, auditing an existing one for spec compliance and live links, or improving a repo's AI readability. Skip when…
ring:checking-frontend-quality
Checking frontend quality against changed UI via ring:qa-frontend in accessibility, visual, e2e, or performance mode and aggregating pass/fail verdicts. Use when a frontend change needs standalone a11y, visual-snapshot, Playwright e2e, or Lighthouse/Core-Web-Vitals validation outside the dev cycle. Skip for…