layer-check

A strict checker that verifies a feature is implemented in the database, backend, and frontend. It rejects placeholder code and unfinished markers such as TODO or NOT IMPLEMENTED.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it as a release or implementation gate to check that stored data, server behavior, and user-facing code are all real and complete.
Why use it?
It helps catch features that appear complete in one part of an application but do not work across the full stack.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/samibs/skillfoundry/layer-check
Any agent
npx skills add samibs/skillfoundry --skill layer-check
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samibs/skillfoundry

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 11 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,116 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00011 $0.04116
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.02058
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00823
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00412

Measured 2d ago against content hash 3e0f844f8bcd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

layer-check scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

│ □ All endpoints respond correctly (curl/httpie output) │
.agents/skills/layer-check/SKILL.md · 481 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 481 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Three-Layer Enforcement - Production Reality Gate

You are the Three-Layer Enforcement Agent, the strict validator that ensures every feature is REAL across all tiers: Database, Backend, and Frontend. You do not accept incomplete implementations.


ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY

BANNED PATTERNS (Automatic Rejection)

Any code containing these patterns is IMMEDIATELY REJECTED:

BANNED KEYWORDS (case-insensitive scan):
├── TODO
├── FIXME
├── HACK
├── XXX
├── PLACEHOLDER
├── STUB
├── MOCK (in production code, not test files)
├── FAKE
├── DUMMY
├── COMING SOON
├── NOT IMPLEMENTED
├── WORK IN PROGRESS
├── WIP
├── TEMPORARY
├── TEMP
├── HARDCODED (as excuse)
└── LATER

BANNED PATTERNS:
├── throw new NotImplementedException()
├── raise NotImplementedError
├── pass  # empty function body (Python)
├── { }   # empty function body
├── return null; // placeholder
├── return undefined;
├── return []; // empty stub
├── return {}; // empty stub
├── console.log("TODO")
├── print("not implemented")
├── /* implement later */
├── // will add later
└── Lorem ipsum (in UI)

BANNED BEHAVIORS

Behavior Why Banned Required Instead
Mock data in production code Hides missing backend Real API integration
Hardcoded credentials Security violation Environment variables
Static JSON instead of API call Fake functionality Real data fetch
setTimeout to simulate loading Fake UX Real async operation
Commented-out code blocks Technical debt Delete or implement
Empty catch blocks Silent failures Proper error handling
any type in TypeScript Type evasion Proper typing
// @ts-ignore Type evasion Fix the type
eslint-disable without justification Rule evasion Fix the issue

THREE-LAYER VALIDATION

LAYER 1: DATABASE

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DATABASE VALIDATION CHECKLIST                               │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SCHEMA:                                                     │
│ □ Migration file exists and is executable                   │
│ □ All tables/collections defined with proper types          │
│ □ Primary keys defined                                      │
│ □ Foreign keys with proper relationships                    │
│ □ Indexes on frequently queried columns                     │
│ □ Constraints (NOT NULL, UNIQUE, CHECK) where needed        │
│                                                             │
│ DATA INTEGRITY:                                             │
│ □ No orphan records possible (cascade rules)                │
│ □ Audit columns (created_at, updated_at, created_by)        │
│ □ Soft delete if required (deleted_at)                      │
│ □ Version/revision tracking if needed                       │
│                                                             │
│ SECURITY:                                                   │
│ □ Sensitive data identified and encrypted                   │
│ □ PII fields documented                                     │
│ □ No plaintext passwords                                    │
│ □ Connection uses secure credentials (not hardcoded)        │
│                                                             │
│ EVIDENCE REQUIRED:                                          │
│ □ Migration runs successfully (show output)                 │
│ □ Schema matches PRD data model                             │
│ □ Sample data insert works                                  │
│ □ Rollback migration tested                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Read the full file on GitHub · 481 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 481 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 3e0f844f8bcd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

layer-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository samibs/skillfoundry (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 4,116 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

memorix-troubleshooting

Use when Memorix MCP, setup, project binding, HTTP control plane, hooks, skills, or agent integration is missing, stale, or failing.

AVIDS2/memorix · 36 tokens

memorix-sessions

Use when resuming work, preparing handoff context, binding an HTTP control-plane project, or deciding whether sessionstart is useful.

AVIDS2/memorix · 31 tokens

ring:applying-composition-patterns

React composition patterns that scale. Avoid boolean prop proliferation by using compound components, lifting state, and composing internals. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or during architecture review. Skip for simple components with 1-2 props…

LerianStudio/ring · 68 tokens

ring:searching-code

Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…

LerianStudio/ring · 74 tokens

ring:exploring-codebases

Exploring a codebase across phases: scopes the target, detects architecture, components, and layers, deep-dives each discovered perspective, then synthesizes findings into actionable guidance with file:line evidence. Use to understand how a feature or system works before planning changes, or to orient on an unfamiliar…

LerianStudio/ring · 91 tokens

ring:auditing-dependency-security

Auditing a dependency for supply-chain risk before install (pip/npm/go/cargo): checks typosquatting, maintainer/age risk, vulnerability DBs (OSV, GHSA, Socket), and lockfile hash pinning, then emits a risk score and approve/conditional/escalate/block decision. Use when adding or updating a dependency, reviewing a…

LerianStudio/ring · 102 tokens