Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add samuelpatro/.claude --skill prune-branchesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samuelpatro/.claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/samuelpatro/.claude/prune-branches)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samuelpatro/.claude/prune-branches"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samuelpatro/.claude/prune-branches/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samuelpatro/.claude/prune-branches"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samuelpatro/.claude/prune-branches.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00472 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00236 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
prune-branches scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 51 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A a56aa18ea2ac
prune-branches is a skill published in the GitHub repository samuelpatro/.claude (3 stars, last pushed 9d ago), with no licence file. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 472 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyze-logs
You are a system administrator and service reliability engineer at a large tech company.
sc-diff-report
Incremental security scan for changed files only — optimized for PR and commit-level reviews.
safe-extraction
Apply when extracting code from a large monolith file into submodules. Covers barrel re-exports, internals DI seam proxy patterns, CI invariant allowlist updates, and cross-file test verification. Prevents CI failures, broken imports, and test regressions from code extraction.
gwm
Manage git worktrees across any repository with the gwm Rust binary (CLI + ratatui TUI). Use when the user asks to create / list / remove / bootstrap / switch / link worktrees, run a command across worktrees (gwm exec) or reclaim build artifacts (gwm clean), materialise a PR into a worktree (gwm review), drive a…
contributing
Codex adapter for the opencode-swarm contribution checklist. Use when preparing user-visible changes, release note fragments, local validation, branch hygiene, PR checklist items, or contribution-policy compliance before publishing work.
guide-recap
Transform CHANGELOG entries into social content (LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Newsletter, Slack) in FR + EN. Use after releases or weekly to generate release notes, announcements, social media posts, or recap summaries from guide updates.