Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm --skill fork-pr-operationsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/fork-pr-operations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/fork-pr-operations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/fork-pr-operations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/fork-pr-operations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/fork-pr-operations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 74 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 134 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 135 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 136 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.01291 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00516 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00258 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
fork-pr-operations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fork PR Operations
Fork PRs — where the head repository differs from the base repository — have a distinct operational lifecycle. GitHub treats them with stricter security defaults that require additional steps not needed for same-repo PRs.
When to use this skill
- You are pushing to a branch on a forked repository
- CI checks are stuck in "waiting" status after a push
- You need to rebase a fork PR branch against upstream/main
- A bot reviewer posts after every push, creating multiple review rounds
Workflow approval after push
Critical: GitHub requires explicit workflow approval for fork PRs. After every push, CI jobs remain in "waiting" status until a user with write access to the base repository approves the workflow run.
Approval command
# List pending workflow runs for the PR
gh run list --repo <upstream-owner>/<upstream-repo> --branch <branch-name> --limit 5
# Approve a specific run
gh api -X POST repos/<upstream-owner>/<upstream-repo>/actions/runs/<run-id>/approve
Race condition: run not yet created
After pushing, there is a brief window (1-5 seconds) before GitHub creates the workflow run object. If you try to approve too quickly, the run won't exist yet. Retry with a short delay:
# Wait for run to appear, then approve
sleep 5
gh run list --repo <upstream-owner>/<upstream-repo> --branch <branch-name> --limit 1 --json databaseId,status --jq '.[0]'
# If status is "waiting", approve:
gh api -X POST repos/<upstream-owner>/<upstream-repo>/actions/runs/<databaseId>/approve
Permission requirements
The gh api -X POST .../approve call requires actions: write permission on the base (upstream) repository. This typically means your GitHub token needs the repo or public_repo scope, and you must have write access to the upstream repo. Fork owners without upstream write access cannot approve workflow runs — only upstream maintainers can.
gh auth status
# Verify you have repo/public_repo scope and write access to the upstream repo
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · +1 lines 09f3f9afb030
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 9b9fb9576dbd
fork-pr-operations is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm (510 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,291 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autofix-pr
Watch a pull request and fix it from a worktree of its own - CI failures, review feedback from trusted authors and merge conflicts are fixed, pushed to the PR branch and answered on the PR under the user's git and gh identity. Usage - /autofix-pr [ | ] [--once] [--every ] [--no-reply] [--yes] [instructions]…
repo-hygiene
Use when the scheduled repo-hygiene workflow runs from GitHub Actions (or an operator dry-run) to scan the repository for small, certain docs/test/code hygiene issues and fix them as one batched branch.
create-issue
Draft and submit a GitHub issue from a user idea or bug description, with bilingual body and correct labels.
docs-update-from-diff
Review local code changes with git diff and update the official docs under docs/ to match. Use when the user asks to document current uncommitted work, sync docs with local changes, update docs after a feature or refactor, or when phrases like "git diff", "local changes", "update docs", or "official docs" appear.
prepare-pr
Prepare GitHub pull request title and body files from the current branch diff, especially for non-interactive CI/autofix flows that must follow the repository PR template without pushing or creating the PR.
triage
Gatekeep and review GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers. Use for GitHub Action issue triage, PR admission checks, product-direction review, KISS-focused PR review, and staged bilingual GitHub comments.