Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sananthanarayan/skilldrop --skill behaviour-equivalencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sananthanarayan/skilldropWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sananthanarayan/skilldrop/behaviour-equivalence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sananthanarayan/skilldrop/behaviour-equivalence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sananthanarayan/skilldrop/behaviour-equivalence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sananthanarayan/skilldrop/behaviour-equivalence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sananthanarayan/skilldrop/behaviour-equivalence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00199 | $0.02890 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00080 | $0.01156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00578 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00289 |
Grade A, and why
behaviour-equivalence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
28 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/eval_queries.json 1.3 KB
- evals/evals.json 10 KB
- evals/files/1/cases.jsonl 1.7 KB
- evals/files/1/new.jsonl 3.9 KB
- evals/files/1/notes.md 859 B
- evals/files/1/old_rerun.jsonl 3.9 KB
- evals/files/1/old.jsonl 3.9 KB
- evals/files/1/pricing_v1.py 1.8 KB runs code
- evals/files/1/pricing_v2.py 2.1 KB runs code
- evals/files/1/rules.json 681 B
- evals/files/3/diff-summary.txt 812 B
- evals/files/4/diff.txt 183 B
- evals/files/4/fee_calc_py2.py 626 B runs code
- evals/files/4/fee_calc_py3.py 782 B runs code
- evals/files/4/input.csv 268 B
- evals/files/4/new_output.csv 440 B
- evals/files/4/old_output.csv 443 B
- evals/files/5/normalisation.yaml 445 B
- evals/files/5/recordings/new_run.jsonl 2.5 KB
- evals/files/5/recordings/old_run1.jsonl 2.7 KB
- evals/files/5/recordings/old_run2.jsonl 2.7 KB
- evals/files/5/TEAM_NOTES.md 843 B
- examples/delivery-date.md 3.8 KB
- manifest.json 2.1 KB
- reference.md 6.1 KB
- scripts/golden_diff.py 22 KB runs code
- templates/accepted.json 228 B
- templates/rules.json 402 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 156 lines · 199 tokens per session scan A e711b33b323f
behaviour-equivalence is a skill published in the GitHub repository sananthanarayan/skilldrop (2 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 199 tokens to every session and 2,890 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
module-regression
Govern cross-module regression in large repositories with a REGRESSION.md ledger that records each module's downstream consumers and executable acceptance command. After a change, run the changed module and every affected downstream command, and use observed exit codes as regression evidence under the project's…
langsmith-observability
LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.
test-flakiness
Find flaky tests from CI logs — aggregates pass rates, spots intermittent failures, recommends quarantine. After multiple runs.
maintain-formal-verification-skill
Bring a project's formal verification back in line with the code after the code changes: find the commits that touched verified code, update the model, harness, or properties to describe the code as it is now, rerun, and say whether each failure is drift in the verification or a bug in the code. Use for…
prevent-recurrence
Use when correcting an issue or failure reveals a reusable prevention lesson, including code, setup, measurement, validation, workflow, agent mistakes, or accepted code-review findings; when someone says "this keeps happening" or asks how to stop it; or in post-incident follow-up. Fixes the instance (failing-first…