Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills --skill pt-gaining-accessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills/pt-gaining-access)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills/pt-gaining-access"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills/pt-gaining-access/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills/pt-gaining-access"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills/pt-gaining-access.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00387 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
pt-gaining-access scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pen Test Gaining Access
Authorized Use Only
Only perform controlled exploitation on explicitly approved targets. Avoid destructive actions, production instability, and unnecessary data access. Stop immediately if impact exceeds rules of engagement.
Objectives
- Validate whether identified weaknesses are exploitable.
- Demonstrate business-relevant impact with minimum disruption.
- Capture reproducible evidence for remediation.
Workflow
- Select candidates:
- Use only prioritized, in-scope findings from scanning
- Confirm preconditions and rollback/safety plan
- Define proof-of-concept boundaries:
- Minimal payloads to prove exploitability
- No persistence unless separately authorized
- Execute controlled validation:
- Record each step, command, and response
- Confirm exploit chain and resulting access level
- Assess blast radius:
- Determine reachable systems/data from obtained access
- Validate privilege boundaries and segmentation controls
- Package evidence:
- Reproduction steps
- Impact statement in business terms
- Immediate containment recommendations
Output Template
# Gaining Access Output
## Tested Vulnerability
- Identifier:
- Target:
- Preconditions:
## Validation Result
- Exploitable: Yes/No/Partial
- Access achieved:
- Impact observed:
## Evidence
- Reproduction steps:
- Logs/screenshots/artifacts:
## Risk Statement
- Technical impact:
- Business impact:
- Likelihood:
## Handoff
- Needed remediation owners:
- Retest criteria:
Quality Checks
- PoCs are non-destructive and scoped.
- Evidence is enough for independent reproduction.
- Impact is clearly tied to business risk.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 71 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A d5357890e76b
pt-gaining-access is a skill published in the GitHub repository santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills (24 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 387 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.