Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add saolalab/clawforce --skill architecture-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saolalab/clawforceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saolalab/clawforce/architecture-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saolalab/clawforce/architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saolalab/clawforce/architecture-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00756 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00378 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
architecture-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Architecture Review
RFC Template
Use this template for Request for Comments on significant architecture changes:
# RFC: {Title}
## Context
{Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve?}
## Options Considered
### Option A: {Name}
- **Pros**: {list}
- **Cons**: {list}
- **Cost**: {estimate}
- **Timeline**: {estimate}
### Option B: {Name}
- **Pros**: {list}
- **Cons**: {list}
- **Cost**: {estimate}
- **Timeline**: {estimate}
## Decision
{Which option was chosen and why}
## Consequences
- **Positive**: {expected benefits}
- **Negative**: {trade-offs and risks}
- **Neutral**: {side effects}
ADR Template
Architecture Decision Records document key technical choices:
# ADR {Number}: {Title}
**Status**: {Proposed | Accepted | Rejected | Deprecated | Superseded}
**Date**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
## Context
{What is the issue we're addressing?}
## Decision
{What is the change we're proposing or have agreed to?}
## Consequences
{What becomes easier or more difficult? What are the trade-offs?}
## Alternatives Considered
- {Alternative 1}: {Why it was rejected}
- {Alternative 2}: {Why it was rejected}
System Design Review Checklist
When reviewing a system design, evaluate against these dimensions:
Scalability
- Can it handle 10x current load?
- What are the bottlenecks?
- Is horizontal scaling possible?
- Are there stateful components that limit scaling?
Reliability
- What is the expected uptime target?
- How are failures handled?
- What are single points of failure?
- Is there redundancy at critical layers?
Security
- How is authentication/authorization handled?
- Are secrets properly managed?
- Is data encrypted in transit and at rest?
- What are the attack surfaces?
- Is input validation comprehensive?
Observability
- What metrics are tracked?
- How are errors logged and alerted?
- Can we trace requests across services?
- Is there sufficient visibility for debugging?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 125 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 429098dab546
architecture-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository saolalab/clawforce (38 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 756 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qodo-pr-resolver
Review and resolve PR issues with Qodo - get AI-powered code review issues and fix them interactively (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps).
code-review
A code-review and quality-analysis skill written in Chinese. It is intended to inspect code, find potential problems, and suggest improvements.
clean-code-zh
A Chinese-language guide to the principles from Robert C. Martin's book Clean Code. It covers naming, functions, comments, and error handling during code writing, review, and refactoring.
clean-code
Applies principles from Robert C. Martin's 'Clean Code'. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to ensure high quality, readability, and maintainability. Covers naming, functions, comments, error handling, and class design.
github
GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…
github
GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…