architecture-review

architecture-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from saolalab/clawforce. It costs 36 tokens per session (756 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A framework for evaluating major system design changes and recording technical decisions. An RFC is a proposal for discussion, while an ADR records an accepted or rejected architecture choice.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare architecture options, write RFCs and ADRs, review system designs, and track the effects of technology choices.
Why use it?
It makes trade-offs, alternatives, consequences, and technical debt visible instead of leaving important decisions undocumented.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to compare architecture options, write RFCs and ADRs, review system…

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/saolalab/clawforce/architecture-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add saolalab/clawforce --skill architecture-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saolalab/clawforce

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for architecture-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saolalab/clawforce/architecture-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saolalab/clawforce/architecture-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saolalab/clawforce/architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saolalab/clawforce/architecture-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 756 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.00756
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00378
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00151
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00076

Measured 7d ago against content hash 429098dab546, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

architecture-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

marketplace/roles/cto/workspace/skills/architecture-review/SKILL.md · 125 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Architecture Review

RFC Template

Use this template for Request for Comments on significant architecture changes:

# RFC: {Title}

## Context

{Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve?}

## Options Considered

### Option A: {Name}
- **Pros**: {list}
- **Cons**: {list}
- **Cost**: {estimate}
- **Timeline**: {estimate}

### Option B: {Name}
- **Pros**: {list}
- **Cons**: {list}
- **Cost**: {estimate}
- **Timeline**: {estimate}

## Decision

{Which option was chosen and why}

## Consequences

- **Positive**: {expected benefits}
- **Negative**: {trade-offs and risks}
- **Neutral**: {side effects}

ADR Template

Architecture Decision Records document key technical choices:

# ADR {Number}: {Title}

**Status**: {Proposed | Accepted | Rejected | Deprecated | Superseded}

**Date**: {YYYY-MM-DD}

## Context

{What is the issue we're addressing?}

## Decision

{What is the change we're proposing or have agreed to?}

## Consequences

{What becomes easier or more difficult? What are the trade-offs?}

## Alternatives Considered

- {Alternative 1}: {Why it was rejected}
- {Alternative 2}: {Why it was rejected}

System Design Review Checklist

When reviewing a system design, evaluate against these dimensions:

Scalability

  • Can it handle 10x current load?
  • What are the bottlenecks?
  • Is horizontal scaling possible?
  • Are there stateful components that limit scaling?

Reliability

  • What is the expected uptime target?
  • How are failures handled?
  • What are single points of failure?
  • Is there redundancy at critical layers?

Security

  • How is authentication/authorization handled?
  • Are secrets properly managed?
  • Is data encrypted in transit and at rest?
  • What are the attack surfaces?
  • Is input validation comprehensive?

Observability

  • What metrics are tracked?
  • How are errors logged and alerted?
  • Can we trace requests across services?
  • Is there sufficient visibility for debugging?

Read the full file on GitHub · 125 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 125 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 429098dab546

Subscribe to this mod's changes

architecture-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository saolalab/clawforce (38 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 756 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

qodo-pr-resolver

Review and resolve PR issues with Qodo - get AI-powered code review issues and fix them interactively (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps).

sbusso/claudeclaw · 40 tokens

code-review

A code-review and quality-analysis skill written in Chinese. It is intended to inspect code, find potential problems, and suggest improvements.

RTGS2017/NagaAgent · 42 tokens

clean-code-zh

A Chinese-language guide to the principles from Robert C. Martin's book Clean Code. It covers naming, functions, comments, and error handling during code writing, review, and refactoring.

jackjin1997/ClawForge · 48 tokens

clean-code

Applies principles from Robert C. Martin's 'Clean Code'. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to ensure high quality, readability, and maintainability. Covers naming, functions, comments, error handling, and class design.

jackjin1997/ClawForge · 53 tokens

github

GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…

YASSERRMD/clawforge · 101 tokens

github

GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…

samttoo22-MewCat/OpenSoul · 101 tokens