Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sbusso/claudeclaw --skill qodo-pr-resolvergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sbusso/claudeclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sbusso/claudeclaw/qodo-pr-resolver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sbusso/claudeclaw/qodo-pr-resolver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sbusso/claudeclaw/qodo-pr-resolver.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.03937 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01969 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00787 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00394 |
Grade A, and why
qodo-pr-resolver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- qodo-pr-resolver — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- qodo-pr-resolver — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- qodo-pr-resolver — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- qodo-pr-resolver — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- qodo-pr-resolver — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- qodo-pr-resolver — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- qodo-pr-resolver — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- qodo-pr-resolver — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 327 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Qodo PR Resolver
Fetch Qodo review issues for your current branch's PR/MR, fix them interactively or in batch, and reply to each inline comment with the decision. Supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps.
Prerequisites
Required Tools:
- Git - For branch operations
- Git Provider CLI - One of:
gh(GitHub),glab(GitLab),bb(Bitbucket), oraz(Azure DevOps)
Installation and authentication details: See providers.md for provider-specific setup instructions.
Required Context:
- Must be in a git repository
- Repository must be hosted on a supported git provider (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps)
- Current branch must have an open PR/MR
- PR/MR must have been reviewed by Qodo (pr-agent-pro bot, qodo-merge[bot], etc.)
Quick Check:
git --version # Check git installed
git remote get-url origin # Identify git provider
See providers.md for provider-specific verification commands.
Understanding Qodo Reviews
Qodo (formerly Codium AI) is an AI-powered code review tool that analyzes PRs/MRs with compliance checks, bug detection, and code quality suggestions.
Bot Identifiers
Look for comments from: pr-agent-pro, pr-agent-pro-staging, qodo-merge[bot], qodo-ai[bot]
Review Comment Types
- PR Compliance Guide 🔍 - Security/ticket/custom compliance with 🟢/🟡/🔴/⚪ indicators
- PR Code Suggestions ✨ - Categorized improvements with importance ratings
- Code Review by Qodo - Structured issues with 🐞/📘/📎 sections and agent prompts (most detailed)
Instructions
When the user asks for a code review, to see Qodo issues, or fix Qodo comments:
Step 0: Check code push status
Check for uncommitted changes, unpushed commits, and get the current branch.
Scenario A: Uncommitted changes exist
- Inform: "⚠️ You have uncommitted changes. These won't be included in the Qodo review."
- Ask: "Would you like to commit and push them first?"
- If yes: Wait for user action, then proceed to Step 1
- If no: Warn "Proceeding with review of pushed code only" and continue to Step 1
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 327 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A c5ceaba9aa82
qodo-pr-resolver is a skill published in the GitHub repository sbusso/claudeclaw (193 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 3,937 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
prepare-pr
End-to-end drives working-tree changes to a review-ready pull request — commit, sync base, squash to one commit, open/update the PR — then KEEPS RUNNING IN-SESSION (poll CI + code-review bots in 5-min rounds, up to 10) fixing every legitimate Critical/High finding and build failure until the PR is review-ready (never…
github-code-review
Review PRs: diffs, inline comments via gh or REST.
ship-pr
Ship one pull request, monitor hosted CI and review feedback, follow PR policy, and request authorization before merging and cleaning up.
Codex
Guides operator-owned delegation to Codex when the task fits a bounded coding lane, review pass, or worktree-isolated implementation track.
GitHub PR Workflow
Move cleanly through branch, diff, review, validation, and PR update steps without losing scope or repository-native workflow.
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination.