Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mihaipora/zorya. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mihaipora/zorya/main/.claude/skills/qodo-pr-resolver/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mihaipora/zoryaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mihaipora/zorya/qodo-pr-resolver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mihaipora/zorya/qodo-pr-resolver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mihaipora/zorya/qodo-pr-resolver/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mihaipora/zorya/qodo-pr-resolver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mihaipora/zorya/qodo-pr-resolver.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.03937 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01575 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00787 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00394 |
Grade A, and why
qodo-pr-resolver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to qodo-pr-resolver — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 327 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Qodo PR Resolver
Fetch Qodo review issues for your current branch's PR/MR, fix them interactively or in batch, and reply to each inline comment with the decision. Supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps.
Prerequisites
Required Tools:
- Git - For branch operations
- Git Provider CLI - One of:
gh(GitHub),glab(GitLab),bb(Bitbucket), oraz(Azure DevOps)
Installation and authentication details: See providers.md for provider-specific setup instructions.
Required Context:
- Must be in a git repository
- Repository must be hosted on a supported git provider (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps)
- Current branch must have an open PR/MR
- PR/MR must have been reviewed by Qodo (pr-agent-pro bot, qodo-merge[bot], etc.)
Quick Check:
git --version # Check git installed
git remote get-url origin # Identify git provider
See providers.md for provider-specific verification commands.
Understanding Qodo Reviews
Qodo (formerly Codium AI) is an AI-powered code review tool that analyzes PRs/MRs with compliance checks, bug detection, and code quality suggestions.
Bot Identifiers
Look for comments from: pr-agent-pro, pr-agent-pro-staging, qodo-merge[bot], qodo-ai[bot]
Review Comment Types
- PR Compliance Guide 🔍 - Security/ticket/custom compliance with 🟢/🟡/🔴/⚪ indicators
- PR Code Suggestions ✨ - Categorized improvements with importance ratings
- Code Review by Qodo - Structured issues with 🐞/📘/📎 sections and agent prompts (most detailed)
Instructions
When the user asks for a code review, to see Qodo issues, or fix Qodo comments:
Step 0: Check code push status
Check for uncommitted changes, unpushed commits, and get the current branch.
Scenario A: Uncommitted changes exist
- Inform: "⚠️ You have uncommitted changes. These won't be included in the Qodo review."
- Ask: "Would you like to commit and push them first?"
- If yes: Wait for user action, then proceed to Step 1
- If no: Warn "Proceeding with review of pushed code only" and continue to Step 1
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 327 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A c5ceaba9aa82
qodo-pr-resolver is a skill published in the GitHub repository mihaipora/zorya (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 3,937 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to qodo-pr-resolver, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…