sapiom-js: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/establishing-authoring-clarity/SKILL.md

establishing-authoring-clarity is a skill for Claude Code from sapiom/sapiom-js. It costs 106 tokens per session (1,325 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An intake guide for authoring Sapiom templates or agents in sapiom-js. It helps clarify the source, outcome, intended user, and wording before code is written.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when starting a new template, changing an existing one, or responding to a vague request to build an agent.
Why use it?
It prevents building an agent from assumptions and having to rewrite unclear placeholder copy later.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is sapiom/sapiom-js's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on sapiom-js itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything sapiom-js configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to sapiom/sapiom-js. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sapiom/sapiom-js/main/.claude/skills/establishing-authoring-clarity/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sapiom/sapiom-js

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for establishing-authoring-clarity

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sapiom/sapiom-js/establishing-authoring-clarity.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sapiom/sapiom-js/establishing-authoring-clarity)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sapiom/sapiom-js/establishing-authoring-clarity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sapiom/sapiom-js/establishing-authoring-clarity.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 106 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,325 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 12
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00106 $0.01325
Opus 5 $0.00053 $0.00662
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00265
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00133

Measured 8d ago against content hash 062c27f4682b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

establishing-authoring-clarity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/establishing-authoring-clarity/SKILL.md · 77 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Establishing authoring clarity

Overview

Before you author a Sapiom template or agent, establish what you're building from. Same rule as its sibling intake, establishing-studio-design-clarity: search first; then — only if you can't find it — ask before you build. Never ask before searching; never invent the product in a vacuum.

The authoring-specific trap: a published template is judged by the person deciding whether to use it (examples/AUTHORING.md) — so the outcome, the target user, and the copy are the substance, and the copy is "most of the work." Writing the index.ts before those are clear produces a runnable agent nobody can evaluate, with placeholder copy you'll rewrite. This skill is deliberately thin — it does not re-teach the SDK; it encodes where the authoring sources live, the classification, the ask-default, and the dispatch.

The intake — run it before you author

1. Classify the work:

Class What it is Rigor
New published template a new directory under examples/, in the gallery full — spec + copy
Change to an existing template edit/fix to a shipped one light
Personal / experiment agent not published to the gallery lightest — just label it

2. Find what you're building from — search before you ask, in order, stop when you have it:

  • The ask itself — the ticket/issue for a spec, or a named reference agent to model.
  • Sibling templatesexamples/ almost always has one that solved a similar job. AUTHORING.md: "look at an existing one — examples/hello-agent is the smallest — and copy its shape." Match a sibling's defineAgent/defineStep graph and template.json shape rather than inventing structure.
  • The authoring guideexamples/AUTHORING.md: the manifest fields, the "runnable with nothing" bar (§1a — {} in, a real run out), categorization (category / discipline / cadence / complexity / step kind), and the voice/copy rules.
  • The gatepnpm examples:check (house-style limits; run it, don't guess them).

Read the full file on GitHub · 77 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 77 lines · 106 tokens per session scan A 062c27f4682b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

establishing-authoring-clarity is a skill published in the GitHub repository sapiom/sapiom-js (19 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 106 tokens to every session and 1,325 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens

chronicle

Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…

microsoft/vscode · 72 tokens