Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/saski/arnesto/review-bugbotnpx skills add saski/arnesto --skill review-bugbotgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saski/arnestoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/review-bugbot)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/review-bugbot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saski/arnesto/review-bugbot.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.01063 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00531 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
review-bugbot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to review-security — 33 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Bugbot
Use this skill when the user asks to run /review-bugbot.
Launch exactly one bugbot subagent with:
run_in_background: falseunless explicitly asked to run in backgrounddescription: "Bugbot"subagent_type: "bugbot"
The review subagent computes the local diff from the repository path, so do not compute the diff yourself before launching it. The repository path should be the active workspace or repository root for the code the user wants reviewed.
By default, the review subagent infers the repository's actual base branch, such as main, when computing branch changes. In most cases, do not provide Base Branch. Only provide it if you know the current branch or PR should be compared against a specific branch other than the repository's default base branch, such as when you created the current branch from another branch.
Special case: if the user explicitly asks to review a specific PR or branch, make sure that target is checked out before launching the subagent:
- Examples include
github.com/... /review,review {link}, orreview {branch-name}. - Resolve the provided PR link, PR number, or branch name to the PR head branch or named branch.
- Check whether the target branch is already the currently checked out local branch. If it is, continue.
- If a different branch is currently checked out, try to switch to the target branch.
- If Git refuses to switch because local files would be overwritten, conflicts need resolution, or another checkout blocker occurs, explain the blocker and ask whether the user wants to stash local changes before retrying.
- Only stash after the user confirms. If the stash succeeds, retry switching to the target branch.
- Launch the review subagent only after the target branch is checked out locally.
Use this exact prompt shape:
Full Repository Path: <absolute repository path>
Diff: <one of: "branch changes", "uncommitted changes", "natural language">
Base Branch: <only include this line when reviewing branch changes against a known specific base branch>
Change Description: <required only when Diff is "natural language"; list each changed file and what changed in it>
Custom Instructions: <only include this line when the user gave specific review instructions>
Default to branch changes, which reviews branch changes against the merge-base with the default/base branch, including committed, staged, and unstaged changes. If the user asks to review only uncommitted, local working tree, dirty, or not-yet-committed changes, use uncommitted changes.
If the review subagent fails before producing findings, inspect the failure text.
-
If the failure is caused by calling the subagent incorrectly, such as a missing
Full Repository Path, missingDiff, wrong prompt shape, or wrong subagent type, correct the invocation and retry it once immediately. -
If the subagent reports it could not compute the diff (for example an empty diff, missing diff metadata, or that it could not compute the diff), retry once with
Diff: natural language, omittingBase Branchand providing aChange Description. The subagent will read those files directly. Only use this as a last resort, after the regular diff-based review has failed because the diff could not be computed.Write the
Change Descriptionas one block per changed file: a<path> (added|modified|deleted|renamed)header followed by bullet points of what changed. Mention line numbers or ranges inline where they help and you know them (for example(L40-58)oraround L120); they are optional, not required on every bullet. Example:src/auth/login.ts (modified): - rewrote validateSession (L40-58) to check token expiry before the DB lookup - removed the fallback that accepted empty tokens src/auth/legacy.ts (deleted) src/auth/mfa.ts (added): - new verifyMfaCode() (L1-30) that calls the TOTP service and rate-limits attempts -
For any other subagent failure, retry once with the same prompt shape.
-
If the same failure persists after the retry, stop. Briefly tell the user that the review subagent could not complete and include the short error or blocker. Do not keep retrying.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 67 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 24bb0b368445
review-bugbot is a skill published in the GitHub repository saski/arnesto (5 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Unlicense. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,063 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to review-security, differing in 33 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
readonly-review
Run a no-network read-only review practice with two explorer steps and one synthesis step.
repo-contracts-and-boundaries
Use when turning architecture, layering, ownership, dependency direction, schemas, structural metrics, quality thresholds, baselines, allowlists, or generated quality snapshots into repository checks.
critique-theater
Five-role Design Jury review that streams scored rounds, persists a replayable transcript, and ships through the daemon's Critique Theater protocol.
code-refiner
Deep code simplification and refactoring preserving behavior across Python, Go, TypeScript, Rust. Targets complexity, anti-patterns, readability debt. Triggers on: "simplify this code", "refactor for clarity", "reduce complexity", "make this more readable", "tech debt cleanup", "too much nesting".
package-optimizer
Evaluate one existing package or bounded package family from recorded evaluator evidence and a capability profile, then propose retain, simplify, strengthen, retire, or inconclusive without editing. Use when optimizing a skill, agent, hook, rule, command, utility, or preset; evaluating whether package detail is…
pr-comment
Post friendly review comments to a GitHub PR — prepare locally, preview, then submit as atomic review. Use when: posting code review comments, giving PR feedback, sending inline suggestions. Not for: reading existing reviews (use load-pr-review), creating PRs (use create-pr), PR status (use pr-summary).