review-security

review-security is a skill for Cursor from saski/arnesto. It costs 12 tokens per session (814 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of review-security, Unlicense.

A code-review instruction that runs a security-focused review of the repository's changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Checking the current repository changes for security issues with a dedicated review agent.
Why use it?
It helps find security weaknesses in changed code before they reach users or production systems.

Skill for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Checking the current repository changes for security issues with a dedicated review agent.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/saski/arnesto/review-security
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add saski/arnesto --skill review-security
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saski/arnesto

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-security

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saski/arnesto/review-security/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/review-security)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/review-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saski/arnesto/review-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-security

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/review-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saski/arnesto/review-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 12 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 814 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00012 $0.00814
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00326
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00002 $0.00163
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00081

Measured 11d ago against content hash 1cb1e2901206, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to review-security — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.cursor/skills-cursor/review-security/SKILL.md · 52 lines

What it actually says

Review Security

Use this skill when the user asks to run /review-security.

Launch exactly one security-review subagent with:

  • run_in_background: false unless explicitly asked to run in background
  • description: "Security Review"
  • subagent_type: "security-review"

The review subagent computes the local diff from the repository path, so do not compute the diff yourself before launching it. Set Full Repository Path to the absolute path of the git repository that contains the changes the user wants reviewed. That repository may be a subfolder of the current workspace. Do not change the agent's workspace root or call move_agent_to_root to review a repository that is already reachable.

By default, the review subagent infers the repository's actual base branch, such as main, when computing branch changes. In most cases, do not provide Base Branch. Only provide it if you know the current branch or PR should be compared against a specific branch other than the repository's default base branch, such as when you created the current branch from another branch.

Special case: if the user explicitly asks to review a specific PR or branch, make sure that target is checked out before launching the subagent:

  • Examples include github.com/... /review, review {link}, or review {branch-name}.
  • Resolve the provided PR link, PR number, or branch name to the PR head branch or named branch.
  • Check whether the target branch is already the currently checked out local branch. If it is, continue.
  • If a different branch is currently checked out, try to switch to the target branch.
  • If Git refuses to switch because local files would be overwritten, conflicts need resolution, or another checkout blocker occurs, explain the blocker and ask whether the user wants to stash local changes before retrying.
  • Only stash after the user confirms. If the stash succeeds, retry switching to the target branch.
  • Launch the review subagent only after the target branch is checked out locally.

Use this exact prompt shape:

Full Repository Path: <absolute repository path>
Diff: <one of: "branch changes", "uncommitted changes">
Base Branch: <only include this line when reviewing branch changes against a known specific base branch>
Custom Instructions: <only include this line when the user gave specific review instructions>

Default to branch changes, which reviews branch changes against the merge-base with the default/base branch, including committed, staged, and unstaged changes. If the user asks to review only uncommitted, local working tree, dirty, or not-yet-committed changes, use uncommitted changes.

If the review subagent fails before producing findings, inspect the failure text.

  • If the failure is caused by calling the subagent incorrectly, such as a missing Full Repository Path, missing Diff, wrong prompt shape, or wrong subagent type, correct the invocation and retry it once immediately.
  • For any other subagent failure, retry once with the same prompt shape.
  • If the same failure persists after the retry, stop. Briefly tell the user that the review subagent could not complete and include the short error or blocker. Do not keep retrying.

After the subagent finishes, summarize the result:

  • If it reports that no diff was found or the diff is empty, tell the user in one sentence that there was no diff to review.
  • If it found no issues, give a one-line status such as "Security review found 2 findings / Security review found no issues".
  • If it found issues, print a compact markdown table with one row per finding, sorted by severity (highest first), using exactly these columns: Severity, Location (file:line), Finding. Put the file and line in the location column as file:line.

Do not fix findings or rerun review unless the user explicitly asks for that next step.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago Changed 1cb1e2901206
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 52 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A d007ec5a617e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository saski/arnesto (6 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Unlicense. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 814 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-security, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

readonly-review

Run a no-network read-only review practice with two explorer steps and one synthesis step.

Ranvier-Technologies/pixir · 20 tokens

repo-contracts-and-boundaries

Use when turning architecture, layering, ownership, dependency direction, schemas, structural metrics, quality thresholds, baselines, allowlists, or generated quality snapshots into repository checks.

yfge/agent-harness-skills · 41 tokens

address-pr-comments

Work through the review comments on a pull request: check each point against the code, make the changes that are right, answer the ones that are not, and hold every reply for approval before it is posted.

androoAGI/starnet · 46 tokens

code-refiner

Deep code simplification and refactoring preserving behavior across Python, Go, TypeScript, Rust. Targets complexity, anti-patterns, readability debt. Triggers on: "simplify this code", "refactor for clarity", "reduce complexity", "make this more readable", "tech debt cleanup", "too much nesting". NOT for deepening…

Mathews-Tom/armory · 91 tokens

package-optimizer

Evaluate one existing package or bounded package family from recorded evaluator evidence and a capability profile, then propose retain, simplify, strengthen, retire, or inconclusive without editing. Use when optimizing a skill, agent, hook, rule, command, utility, or preset; evaluating whether package detail is…

Mathews-Tom/armory · 119 tokens

concord-relay

Keep this Grok session reachable by other Concord agents while idle.

Get-Concord-AI/concord-mcp · 18 tokens