Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add scalarian/oh-my-codex --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/scalarian/oh-my-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/scalarian/oh-my-codex/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/scalarian/oh-my-codex/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/scalarian/oh-my-codex/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/scalarian/oh-my-codex/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/scalarian/oh-my-codex/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00244 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
omx-product-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
OMX Product Review
Purpose
Use this skill when the OMX plugin bundle is installed and a slice, branch, or task is asking for approval. Review should answer "is this ready?" with evidence, not vibes.
Review Order
- Read the changed code and the task or plan it was supposed to satisfy.
- Check the verification evidence:
- tests
- typechecks
- smoke checks
- docs updates
- Inspect
.omx/truth:- task state
- review queue
- inbox messages
- notes or ledger entries
- Record a verdict with
omx team review.
Mandatory Findings
- missing verification for changed paths
- stale docs or setup instructions
- task marked done while review evidence is missing
- runtime state claiming health while inbox or review queues still show unresolved work
Output Standard
- findings first
- severity and file references where relevant
- final verdict: approved, changes requested, or blocked
- next action is explicit
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 40 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 3aff23a24f9c
omx-product-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository scalarian/oh-my-codex (73 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 244 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cn-check
Install and run the Continue CLI (cn) to execute AI agent checks on local code changes. Use when asked to "run checks", "lint with AI", "review my changes with cn", or set up Continue CI locally.
printing-press-output-review
Internal sub-skill: agentic review of a printed CLI's sampled command output for plausibility issues that rule-based checks can't encode (substring-match relevance, format bugs, silent source drops, ranking failures). Invoked via the Skill tool by the main printing-press skill at Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish…
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
review
Validate plans, execution, or PRs against wish criteria — returns SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged gaps.
review
Adversarial fresh-context review of an increment before it ships. Every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use when saying "review", "grill this", or "critique the implementation".
genie-orca-review
Independent, read-only review of a group, a wish, or a PR on Orca — SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged findings. Council and retro are this skill with a different input.