Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/scottlz0310/mcp-resource-subscribernpx agentmods add skills/scottlz0310/mcp-resource-subscriber/pr-review-subscribeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/scottlz0310/mcp-resource-subscriber/pr-review-subscribe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/scottlz0310/mcp-resource-subscriber/pr-review-subscribe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/scottlz0310/mcp-resource-subscriber/pr-review-subscribe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/scottlz0310/mcp-resource-subscriber/pr-review-subscribe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/scottlz0310/mcp-resource-subscriber/pr-review-subscribe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.07843 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.03137 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.01569 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00784 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-subscribe scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
`mcp-gateway` must be running. Verify with `curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8080/health` or How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 802 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
この文書は初期互換性検証の履歴です。旧名・旧protocol・旧レビュー手順を現行の運用指示として使用しないでください。現行CLIは README と 移行手順 を参照してください。レビュー運用skillの管理元はMcp-Dockerです。
pr-review-subscribe
PR review cycle with provider abstraction: review acquisition and thread processing are separate concerns.
provider = auto | copilot-review | codex | external | existing
Review acquisition (provider-specific):
copilot-review → Phase 1S (watch/subscribe/complete)
codex → Phase W (post @codex review comment, wait)
external/human → Phase W (wait for user signal)
existing → skip directly to Phase U1
Unified Review Thread Handling (all providers):
Phase U1 → Phase U2 → Phase 3 → Phase 4 → Phase U5 → Phase U6
If server/tool names differ, load references/tool-template.md and map placeholders before starting.
Required Surfaces
| Placeholder | Purpose | When used |
|---|---|---|
{CRM} |
Copilot review MCP tools: review status, request, watch start/cancel | copilot-review acquisition only |
{GH} |
GitHub issue/PR comment tools | All providers |
{RSRC} |
MCP resource operations: subscribe/read/unsubscribe or SDK wrapper | copilot-review acquisition only |
copilot-review acquisition minimum operations:
{CRM}:get_copilot_review_status{CRM}:request_copilot_review{CRM}:start_copilot_review_watch{CRM}:cancel_copilot_review_watch{CRM}:get_copilot_review_watch_status(fallback polling only){RSRC}:resources/subscribeequivalent for the watch resource{RSRC}:resources/readequivalent for the watch resource{RSRC}:resources/unsubscribeequivalent for the watch resource
Unified thread handling minimum operations (all providers):
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +10 lines 314399da1727
- 28d ago Changed · +2 lines 86664c0840d4
- 2mo ago First seen · 790 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 12dc14881e3d
pr-review-subscribe is a skill published in the GitHub repository scottlz0310/mcp-resource-subscriber (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 7,843 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…