Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sd0xdev/sd0x-harness --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sd0xdev/sd0x-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00247 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00099 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
PR Self-Review
Trigger
- Keywords: pr review, pre-pr, review before PR, self-review, pr-review
When NOT to Use
- Code review by Codex (use
/codex-review-fast) - Document review (use
/codex-review-doc) - Risk assessment only (use
/risk-assess)
Workflow
- Run
/risk-assess --mode fast— if High+, auto-escalate to deep mode - Review: correctness, security, performance
- PR checklist: tests, rollout, compatibility
- Discover new rules -> update CLAUDE.md or
.claude/rules/
Output
## Review Notes
- <findings>
## PR Checklist
- [ ] Risk assessment: Low/Medium (or High+ reviewed and acknowledged)
- [ ] Tests pass
- [ ] No breaking changes
- [ ] Docs updated
## Rules Update (if any)
- <proposed patch>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 2f9046d25316
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository sd0xdev/sd0x-harness (194 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 247 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
comet-github-pr-review
A read-only review process for pull requests in Comet's GitHub repositories. A pull request is a proposed code change; the review checks its current code, related issue, comments, merge status, and automated checks.
update
Safe cc10x upgrade through the Claude Code plugin CLI. Lists every installed scope, refreshes the marketplace, updates each scope, and optionally carries local patches over to the new install. Use this skill when: updating cc10x, upgrading, pulling latest cc10x, syncing plugin, refreshing cache, or checking for new…
resolving-merge-conflicts
Use when a git merge or rebase reports conflicts and the operation is in progress.
code-review
Two-mode skill: (1) adversarial review — spec compliance + code quality + security, confidence-scored findings with file:line evidence; (2) receiving review — verify-before- agreeing discipline for acting on external/human review feedback.
codebase-hygiene
Two-mode skill: (1) find semantic duplicates — functions doing the same thing under different names, invisible to copy-paste detectors; (2) deepen shallow modules — thin wrappers and pass-through layers that spread complexity. Advisory and read-only; changes route through BUILD with full gates.
code-review
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use…