Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to seanrreid/RAD_framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/seanrreid/RAD_framework/main/.agents/skills/accessibility-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seanrreid/RAD_frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/seanrreid/rad_framework/accessibility-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seanrreid/rad_framework/accessibility-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seanrreid/rad_framework/accessibility-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seanrreid/rad_framework/accessibility-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seanrreid/rad_framework/accessibility-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00349 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00140 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
accessibility-review
Run a read-only review of WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility of the changed frontend files.
Input
Read the text the user wrote after the skill name (optional):
- Empty: review every file changed since branching from the default branch.
- File paths: review only those files.
Resolve the default branch and the changed files with:
BASE=$(scripts/get-default-branch.sh)
git diff "$BASE"...HEAD --name-only
If scripts/get-default-branch.sh exits non-zero, report its stderr and stop.
Process
- Build the file list: the files the user named, or the changed files above.
- Spawn the
accessibility-reviewersub-agent, defined at.codex/agents/accessibility-reviewer.toml(it runs withsandbox_mode = "read-only"). Give it the file list and the default branch as context. - Wait for it to finish and report its findings report as written.
Rules
- Never edit, create, or delete files. Never commit or push.
- If the sub-agent cannot be spawned, say so and stop; do not review the files yourself in its place.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago First seen · 39 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A ac789896b70a
accessibility-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository seanrreid/RAD_framework (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 349 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-animations
Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.
ring:validating-ux-completeness
Validating that UX specifications are complete before technical design: a read-only checklist over wireframes, states, responsive behavior, accessibility, and component-library alignment, emitting a DESIGN VALIDATED / NEEDS REVISION verdict to design-validation.md. Standalone utility — run after a product-designer…
a11y-audit
Run a Maestro-style accessibility audit for WCAG compliance, ARIA usage, keyboard navigation, and screen reader compatibility.
seo-audit
Run a Maestro-style SEO assessment for meta tags, structured data, crawlability, and Core Web Vitals.
generic-static-code-reviewer
Review static site code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces pure HTML/CSS/JS standards, minimal page weight, mobile-first design. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing changes.
web-standards-reviewer
Review an existing web project for web-standards use and essential dependencies only, against the rules of /web-conventions, /javascript-conventions, and the stack skill the project composes (web-static, web-sprinkles, web-components), and answer with the shortest possible feedback — one line per finding, one line…