Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skills --skill gha-security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/gha-security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/gha-security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/gha-security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/gha-security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/gha-security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.01957 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00979 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00391 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
gha-security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to gha-security-review — 25 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Actions Security Review
Find exploitable vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions workflows. Every finding MUST include a concrete exploitation scenario — if you can't build the attack, don't report it.
This skill encodes attack patterns from real GitHub Actions exploits — not generic CI/CD theory.
Scope
Review the workflows provided (file, diff, or repo). Research the codebase as needed to trace complete attack paths before reporting.
Files to Review
.github/workflows/*.yml— all workflow definitionsaction.yml/action.yaml— composite actions in the repo.github/actions/*/action.yml— local reusable actions- Config files loaded by workflows:
CLAUDE.md,AGENTS.md,Makefile, shell scripts under.github/
Out of Scope
- Workflows in other repositories (only note the dependency)
- GitHub App installation permissions (note if relevant)
Threat Model
Only report vulnerabilities exploitable by an external attacker — someone without write access to the repository. The attacker can open PRs from forks, create issues, and post comments. They cannot push to branches, trigger workflow_dispatch, or trigger manual workflows.
Do not flag vulnerabilities that require write access to exploit:
workflow_dispatchinput injection — requires write access to trigger- Expression injection in
push-only workflows on protected branches workflow_callinput injection where all callers are internal- Secrets in
workflow_dispatch/schedule-only workflows
Confidence
Report only HIGH and MEDIUM confidence findings. Do not report theoretical issues.
| Confidence | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| HIGH | Traced the full attack path, confirmed exploitable | Report with exploitation scenario and fix |
| MEDIUM | Attack path partially confirmed, uncertain link | Report as needs verification |
| LOW | Theoretical or mitigated elsewhere | Do not report |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · -51 tokens per session b5755fb9f86d
- 9d ago First seen · 198 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A ccd7b57e9f2a
gha-security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skills (70 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,957 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to gha-security-review, differing in 25 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
omh-production-audit
This is a Hermes-native production-audit workflow skill.
devops-cloud
DevOps, cloud infrastructure, and platform engineering. Use when working with AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Terraform, CI/CD pipelines, or infrastructure as code.
investigate-ci
Investigates GitHub Actions workflow failures for any repo. Fetches recent runs, identifies failures, extracts error logs, diagnoses root causes, and suggests fixes. Use when a deploy or CI workflow fails and you need to understand why.
fable-loop
Execute bounded recurring polling loops, CI build babysitting, interval-based status monitors, and self-paced test cycles with explicit timeouts and backoff. Use when monitoring async CI/CD pipelines, polling external service status, running interval test watches, or tracking long-running jobs — even if the user does…
action-builder
Create custom GitHub Actions (composite, Docker, or JavaScript). Use when building reusable actions, creating custom workflow steps, or packaging logic for distribution. Trigger words include "create action", "custom action", "build action", "composite action", "Docker action".
cloud-build-helper
Configures Google Cloud Build pipelines with caching, parallel builds, and optimization. Use when setting up Cloud Build, optimizing build performance, or configuring CI/CD pipelines.