Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Security-Phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-codenpx agentmods add skills/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/0day-scannerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/0day-scanner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/0day-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/0day-scanner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/0day-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/0day-scanner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02976 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01488 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00595 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00298 |
Grade A, and why
0day-scanner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 380 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
0-Day Vulnerability Scanner Skill
Purpose
Analyze code changes (commits, PRs, files) for potential zero-day security vulnerabilities using LLM-powered analysis. This skill provides conversational access to the 0-Day Scanner Agent with real-time token monitoring and knowledge graph integration.
Stack-aware fallback (when MCP unavailable): if
analyze_for_zero_day_vulnerabilitiesis not reachable, detect the changed files' language(s) and load the matching reference pack from../Security-automated-claude-skills/.claude/skills/security-reviewer/languages/{python,javascript-typescript,go,java,rust,ruby,dotnet}.mdto drive a diff-only review using the assistant's built-in tools. Apply the 8-point check from../Security-automated-claude-skills/.claude/skills/security-reviewer/SKILL.mdscoped to the diff.
When to Use
- User asks to "scan for vulnerabilities" or "check for security issues"
- User mentions "0-day", "zero-day", or "security analysis"
- User wants to analyze a specific commit, PR, or file for security
- User requests vulnerability assessment during code review
Workflow
1. Parse User Request
Extract:
- Target: Commit SHA, PR number, file path, or branch
- Scope: Single commit (light), multiple commits (standard), or full branch (deep)
- Budget: Max cost willing to spend (default: $0.10 for light mode)
- Options: Link to graph, save to DB, return reasoning
2. Invoke Scanner
Use MCP tool analyze_for_zero_day_vulnerabilities:
{
"commit_sha": "abc123def456",
"mode": "light",
"max_cost_usd": 0.10,
"link_to_graph": true,
"save_to_db": true,
"stream_tokens": true,
"return_reasoning": true
}
3. Monitor Progress
- Stream token usage updates to user
- Report estimated cost and time remaining
- Show findings as they're discovered
4. Present Results
If vulnerabilities found:
- Summarize each vulnerability with severity and type
- Show affected code and proof of concept
- Display knowledge graph context (affected symbols, blast radius)
- Provide remediation suggestions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 380 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e2637ed57f2a
0day-scanner is a skill published in the GitHub repository Security-Phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code (70 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,976 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…