Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Senpi-ai/senpi-skills --skill senpi-tradegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Senpi-ai/senpi-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/senpi-ai/senpi-skills/senpi-trade)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/senpi-ai/senpi-skills/senpi-trade"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/senpi-ai/senpi-skills/senpi-trade/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/senpi-ai/senpi-skills/senpi-trade"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/senpi-ai/senpi-skills/senpi-trade.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 289 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 238 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00342 | $0.08516 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00137 | $0.03406 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00068 | $0.01703 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00852 |
Grade A, and why
senpi-trade scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 393 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Senpi Trade — execute a direct trade with the user, one decision at a time
This skill runs the two direct trade paths: a manual one-off position (open / edit / close) and a mirror of a specific trader. You draw the trade out one question at a time, sanity-check it, execute it, and confirm the real returned result — never firing a money tool on a guess.
Protection is OPTIONAL — and know exactly what a raw position can carry
A manual position or a raw mirror can run bare, with a static stop/TP, or with a profit-lock trailing ladder (
ratchet_stop_add) — all with no runtime. But be precise about that ladder: it is profit-lock ONLY. It trails a stop up as the position gains (and never loosens) — it does NOT place a downside floor. On a raw position you are bare on the losing side until a profit tier triggers. (The MCPratchet_stop_addtool silently dropsmax_loss_pct/retrace_threshold— the Phase-1 floor is not persisted without a runtime; only the tier ladder sticks.)So without a runtime, "protection" is one of two things, never a pair you can promise: the profit-lock ladder (ratchets up as you win) or a static SL (
edit_position— fixed, does not ratchet). A position has one stop order, and once a ratchet is active the engine owns it:ratchet_stop_addREPLACES a static SL. Name the stop the user gives up, get a yes, then readstrategy_get_open_ordersback and report what actually rests. Don't call either one "DSL."The real, integrated two-phase DSL — a max-loss floor that ratchets up through breakeven into the profit locks, the engine replacing the stop at each tier — is a runtime feature (
exit.dsl_preset); a managed mirror template has it built in and auto-applies it on every fill. Don't tell a user a raw position "can't be protected" (it can — profit-lock + a static SL), but don't oversell it as DSL either. When they want a true two-sided ratcheting stop → managed template.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed · +4 lines 52da5a75ebbd
- 21d ago Changed · +10 lines 6820aea8b40c
- 28d ago Changed · +8 lines d1047ba630af
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines bbf4b5185ebb
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 0f78a3c32f5a
- 1mo ago Changed · +16 lines 16fea707a929
- 1mo ago Changed · +49 lines · +51 tokens per session 9d156ee504aa
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 6c58c8a17cd4
- 2mo ago First seen · 293 lines · 291 tokens per session scan A 866f75552c4a
senpi-trade is a skill published in the GitHub repository Senpi-ai/senpi-skills (144 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 342 tokens to every session and 8,516 once invoked, about $0.0014 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
senpi-trade compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| senpi-tradeSenpi-ai/senpi-skills | Skill | 144 | yesterday | MIT | A | 342 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agentic-streetLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code, Codex |
| token-pickaeonfun/aeon | Skill | 788 | yesterday | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code, Codex |
| bridgealsk1992/CloddsBot | Skill | 3.1k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code, Codex |
| hyperliquidalsk1992/CloddsBot | Skill | 3.1k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code, Codex |
| marginfialsk1992/CloddsBot | Skill | 3.1k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code, Codex |
| airdrop-hunting-guidenirholas/three.ws | Skill | 269 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |