code-quality

code-quality is a skill for Claude Code from sequenzia/agent-alchemy. It costs 33 tokens per session (1,803 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Guidelines for reviewing and improving software code using principles such as SOLID, avoiding unnecessary duplication, and choosing suitable testing strategies.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during code reviews and feature development to assess structure, responsibilities, extensibility, duplication, and tests.
Why use it?
It gives developers a consistent way to spot difficult-to-maintain designs and improve implementation quality.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

Part of the agent-alchemy-dev-tools plugin — 9 skills, 4 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it during code reviews and feature development to assess structure, responsibilities, extensibility, duplication, and tests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-quality
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add sequenzia/agent-alchemy --skill code-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sequenzia/agent-alchemy

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install agent-alchemy-dev-tools, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 9 skills, 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-quality

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-quality/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-quality)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-quality

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sequenzia/agent-alchemy/code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 33 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,803 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00033 $0.01803
Opus 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00721
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00361
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00180

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 690cb8ed81cc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

claude/dev-tools/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md · 347 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 347 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Quality

This skill provides code quality principles and best practices for reviewing and improving implementations.


SOLID Principles

Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)

A class/function should have one reason to change.

Bad:

class UserService {
  createUser(data) { /* creates user */ }
  sendEmail(user) { /* sends email */ }
  generateReport(users) { /* generates report */ }
}

Good:

class UserService {
  createUser(data) { /* creates user */ }
}
class EmailService {
  sendEmail(user) { /* sends email */ }
}
class ReportService {
  generateReport(users) { /* generates report */ }
}

Open/Closed Principle (OCP)

Open for extension, closed for modification.

Bad: Adding new payment types requires modifying existing code

function processPayment(type, amount) {
  if (type === 'credit') { /* ... */ }
  else if (type === 'debit') { /* ... */ }
  // Must modify to add new types
}

Good: New payment types can be added without modification

interface PaymentProcessor {
  process(amount: number): Promise<void>;
}
class CreditProcessor implements PaymentProcessor { /* ... */ }
class DebitProcessor implements PaymentProcessor { /* ... */ }

Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)

Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types.

Bad:

class Bird {
  fly() { /* ... */ }
}
class Penguin extends Bird {
  fly() { throw new Error("Can't fly!"); } // Violates LSP
}

Good:

class Bird { /* ... */ }
class FlyingBird extends Bird {
  fly() { /* ... */ }
}
class Penguin extends Bird { /* no fly method */ }

Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)

Clients shouldn't depend on interfaces they don't use.

Bad:

interface Worker {
  work(): void;
  eat(): void;
  sleep(): void;
}

Good:

interface Workable { work(): void; }
interface Eatable { eat(): void; }
interface Sleepable { sleep(): void; }

Read the full file on GitHub · 347 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 347 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 690cb8ed81cc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository sequenzia/agent-alchemy (45 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,803 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

arrow-maintenance

Navigation and audit overlay for linked-intent development. Use when working with docs/arrows/ — orienting via index.yaml, auditing spec-to-code coherence, detecting reverse orphans and drift, splitting/merging/renaming/re-parenting segments. Dual-mode: ambient guidance when the overlay is present…

jszmajda/lid · 85 tokens

review-depth

Experimental declared review depth for linked-intent development. Use when a LID project's instruction file declares a review depth in prose (e.g. "Review depth - I review through LLD; below that, consolidate to one review") or the user asks to batch phase reviews, consolidate stops, or let go below a phase depth.…

jszmajda/lid · 93 tokens

bidirectional-differential

Audit coherence across an arrow of intent by running two parallel fresh Claude sessions — one reconstructs code from a single EARS, the other reconstructs the EARS from stripped code — then classifies the drift between them. Use when the user invokes /differential-audit, asks to audit EARS-to-code drift for a feature…

jszmajda/lid · 172 tokens

review

Structured code review with parallel audit agents, confidence-scored triage, and optional auto-fix. Examines uncommitted changes, staged diffs, commit ranges, or specific paths. Produces a tiered report (MUST-FIX / RECOMMENDED / NIT) backed by evidence, then optionally applies fixes with verification.

greglas75/zuvo · 70 tokens

write-tests

Write tests for existing production code. Processes ONE file at a time through a full pipeline: analyze, inventory (frozen BEFORE writing), write, executable coverage gate, verify, blind coverage audit, adversarial review, log. Uses CodeSift for discovery and analysis when available. Modes: [path] (specific target)…

greglas75/zuvo · 87 tokens

db-audit

Database performance and safety audit. 70+ checks across 13 dimensions (DB1-DB13): query patterns, indexes, schema design, connections, transactions, migrations, caching, query optimization, ORM anti-patterns, observability, data lifecycle, DB security, and migration deployment safety. Code-level checks for all ORMs.…

greglas75/zuvo · 115 tokens