code-quality

code-quality is a skill for Claude Code from sequenzia/claude-plugins. It costs 20 tokens per session (1,774 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of code-quality, MIT.

A set of guidelines for reviewing and improving code, covering design principles, avoiding repeated logic, testing approaches, and implementation practices.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when implementing or reviewing code to apply SOLID principles, DRY practices, testing strategies, and language-independent best practices.
Why use it?
It gives reviews a consistent way to look for hard-to-maintain structure, duplication, missing tests, and other quality problems.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the dev-tools plugin — 6 skills, 5 commands, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it when implementing or reviewing code to apply SOLID principles, DRY practices, testing strategies, and language-independent best practices.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sequenzia/claude-plugins/code-quality
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add sequenzia/claude-plugins --skill code-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sequenzia/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install dev-tools, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 5 commands, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-quality

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sequenzia/claude-plugins/code-quality/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sequenzia/claude-plugins/code-quality)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sequenzia/claude-plugins/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sequenzia/claude-plugins/code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-quality

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sequenzia/claude-plugins/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sequenzia/claude-plugins/code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,774 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.01774
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00710
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00355
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00177

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ad1c5b16117c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to code-quality — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/dev-tools/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md · 344 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 344 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Quality

This skill provides code quality principles and best practices for reviewing and improving implementations.


SOLID Principles

Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)

A class/function should have one reason to change.

Bad:

class UserService {
  createUser(data) { /* creates user */ }
  sendEmail(user) { /* sends email */ }
  generateReport(users) { /* generates report */ }
}

Good:

class UserService {
  createUser(data) { /* creates user */ }
}
class EmailService {
  sendEmail(user) { /* sends email */ }
}
class ReportService {
  generateReport(users) { /* generates report */ }
}

Open/Closed Principle (OCP)

Open for extension, closed for modification.

Bad: Adding new payment types requires modifying existing code

function processPayment(type, amount) {
  if (type === 'credit') { /* ... */ }
  else if (type === 'debit') { /* ... */ }
  // Must modify to add new types
}

Good: New payment types can be added without modification

interface PaymentProcessor {
  process(amount: number): Promise<void>;
}
class CreditProcessor implements PaymentProcessor { /* ... */ }
class DebitProcessor implements PaymentProcessor { /* ... */ }

Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)

Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types.

Bad:

class Bird {
  fly() { /* ... */ }
}
class Penguin extends Bird {
  fly() { throw new Error("Can't fly!"); } // Violates LSP
}

Good:

class Bird { /* ... */ }
class FlyingBird extends Bird {
  fly() { /* ... */ }
}
class Penguin extends Bird { /* no fly method */ }

Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)

Clients shouldn't depend on interfaces they don't use.

Bad:

interface Worker {
  work(): void;
  eat(): void;
  sleep(): void;
}

Good:

interface Workable { work(): void; }
interface Eatable { eat(): void; }
interface Sleepable { sleep(): void; }

Read the full file on GitHub · 344 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 344 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A ad1c5b16117c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository sequenzia/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,774 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to code-quality, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens