Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab --skill eu-acquis-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_labWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/eu-acquis-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/eu-acquis-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/eu-acquis-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/eu-acquis-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/eu-acquis-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00864 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00432 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
eu-acquis-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Право ЕС, ЕСПЧ и сравнительный анализ
Contract
- Job-to-be-done: установить применимый европейский источник и выполнить функциональный, а не поверхностный сравнительный анализ.
- Inputs: вопрос, дата, юрисдикция, предполагаемый акт/механизм и цель сравнения.
- Outputs: source classification, compatibility/adaptation matrix, точные локаторы, контраргументы и ограничения.
- Evidence and safety: предпочитай EUR-Lex, CURIA и HUDOC; различай ЕС, Совет Европы и ЕСПЧ; внешние запросы должны быть публичными.
- Stop conditions: остановись при неясном правовом статусе, неподтвержденной редакции или невозможности проверить официальный текст.
- Acceptance test: вручную проверь CELEX/идентификатор, статус, дату и два ключевых локатора одного акта.
Сначала классифицируй источник
Отдельно обозначь:
- EU primary law;
- regulation, directive, decision;
- delegated/implementing act;
- CJEU judgment/order/opinion;
- recommendation, communication, guideline/soft law;
- ECHR treaty and ECtHR case law (это Совет Европы, не право ЕС);
- международный договор;
- национальная имплементация государства-члена;
- сравнительное право вне acquis.
Процедура для акта ЕС
- Установи официальный title, CELEX/identifier, date, OJ publication.
- Зафиксируй статус, entry into force, application dates, amendments и consolidated version.
- Определи material, territorial, personal и temporal scope.
- Раздели binding obligations, options/discretion, recitals и soft guidance.
- Проверь определения, exceptions, safeguards, reporting/enforcement.
- Найди релевантную CJEU practice; отдели holding и context.
- Для directive определи transposition deadline и пространство национального выбора; не описывай directive как автоматически идентичную национальной норме.
- Установи связь с обязательствами/процессом адаптации Украины, не предполагая ее без источника.
- Занеси точные фрагменты и версии в source register/evidence ledger.
Функциональное сравнение
Для каждой иностранной модели:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 82 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 7c7c96b89c8f
eu-acquis-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab (6 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 864 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-citation-comprehensive
A Chinese and foreign legal-citation tool for checking, completing, explaining, and formatting footnotes under the second edition of a legal citation manual. It handles laws, cases, legal documents, and academic sources when the relevant source material is provided.
legal-fact-checker
A Chinese-language fact-checking guide for legal documents such as contracts, case analyses, legal opinions, and legal assignments. It checks provided drafts against factual and legal support without inventing laws, cases, or facts.
legal-research
A Chinese-language legal research workflow for finding laws, regulations, court cases, compensation standards, and legal grounds.
workflow-overview
A workflow guide for handling complex legal matters through assessment, issue identification, source research, reasoning, fact checking, and document output.
tw-legal-rag
A tool for finding real Taiwan court judgments and legal interpretations with verifiable citations before answering questions about Taiwan law.
legal-research
A structured system for legal research involving laws, court decisions, academic sources, arguments, and evidence. It separates facts, legal claims, scholarly views, and the author's own analysis.