Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab --skill quantitative-impact-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_labWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/quantitative-impact-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/quantitative-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/quantitative-impact-analysis.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00863 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00432 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
quantitative-impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Количественный и impact-анализ
Contract
- Job-to-be-done: получить воспроизводимые показатели и осторожную оценку связи intervention с outcome/impact.
- Inputs: исследовательский вопрос, dataset/source, indicator definitions, периоды, denominators и ограничения доступа.
- Outputs: data note, indicator dictionary, расчеты/код, uncertainty, альтернативные объяснения и выводы.
- Evidence and safety: минимизируй данные, фиксируй lineage, не публикуй персональные строки и не изображай correlation как causation.
- Stop conditions: остановись при неизвестном знаменателе, несовместимой методике, критических quality gaps или запрещенной обработке.
- Acceptance test: вручную воспроизведи один итоговый показатель из исходных строк и сверь округление/период.
Принцип
Число без определения, знаменателя, периода, источника и методики не является доказательством. Не создавай иллюзию точности.
Indicator dictionary
Для каждого показателя зафиксируй:
- name и substantive definition;
- type: input/activity/output/outcome/impact/context;
- unit и denominator;
- formula;
- data owner/source;
- collection method и frequency;
- coverage/population/sample;
- baseline, pre-change, post-change, current, target;
- methodology version и breaks in series;
- missingness/duplicates/outliers;
- comparability across time/regions/groups;
- external factors;
- uncertainty/limitations.
Процедура
- Свяжи показатель с конкретным звеном theory of change. Не используй activity metric как impact.
- Сохрани raw data только в разрешенной зоне; не изменяй оригинал. Создай reproducible transform script/notebook и derived table.
- Проверь schema, types, row counts, uniqueness, missing values, duplicates и impossible values.
- Установи denominator и единицу наблюдения.
- Проверь изменения методологии/coverage. При break in series не сравнивай напрямую без корректировки.
- Раздели descriptive statistics и causal inference.
- Для сравнения используй, где допустимо:
- pre/post trend;
- regions/bodies/groups;
- interrupted time series;
- comparable/control group;
- sensitivity analysis;
- alternative explanations.
- Для privacy-sensitive data применяй minimization, aggregation и suppression small cells.
- Сформируй table/figure с machine-readable source, кодом и checksum.
- Каждый числовой claim добавь в
evidence/CLAIMS.csvс evidence ref на dataset/table/script.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 99 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 044b3a9dfc0e
quantitative-impact-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab (6 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 863 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A Chinese-language legal research workflow for finding laws, regulations, court cases, compensation standards, and legal grounds.
legal-citation-comprehensive
A Chinese and foreign legal-citation tool for checking, completing, explaining, and formatting footnotes under the second edition of a legal citation manual. It handles laws, cases, legal documents, and academic sources when the relevant source material is provided.
legal-fact-checker
A Chinese-language fact-checking guide for legal documents such as contracts, case analyses, legal opinions, and legal assignments. It checks provided drafts against factual and legal support without inventing laws, cases, or facts.
workflow-overview
A workflow guide for handling complex legal matters through assessment, issue identification, source research, reasoning, fact checking, and document output.
tw-legal-rag
A tool for finding real Taiwan court judgments and legal interpretations with verifiable citations before answering questions about Taiwan law.
legal-research
A structured system for legal research involving laws, court decisions, academic sources, arguments, and evidence. It separates facts, legal claims, scholarly views, and the author's own analysis.