Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_labnpx agentmods add skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/redaction-and-disclosureWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/redaction-and-disclosure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/redaction-and-disclosure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/redaction-and-disclosure/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/redaction-and-disclosure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/redaction-and-disclosure.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.00783 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00392 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
redaction-and-disclosure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Redaction и допустимость раскрытия
Contract
- Job-to-be-done: создать минимизированную копию и обоснованное решение о допустимости конкретного раскрытия.
- Inputs: материал, цель/получатель, data classification, правовые и организационные правила.
- Outputs: redacted copy, redaction log, residual-risk findings и требуемое human approval.
- Evidence and safety: оригинал не изменяй; учитывай текст, metadata, вложения, скрытые слои и косвенную идентификацию.
- Stop conditions: останови раскрытие при неизвестной цели, полномочиях, классе, неудаляемом риске или отсутствии approval.
- Acceptance test: вручную проверь копию поиском удаленных значений и просмотром metadata/рендера отдельным reviewer.
Цель
Снизить объем раскрываемых данных до минимально необходимого и сделать решение о раскрытии проверяемым. Этот skill не заменяет решение уполномоченного подразделения по безопасности/защите данных.
Процедура
- Определи target action: web query, remote push, external email/export, public release, subagent/MCP.
- Определи data class по
SECURITY.mdи внутренней политике. Не понижай класс. - Создай inventory чувствительных элементов:
- personal identifiers;
- case/party names;
- addresses/contact/bank/health data;
- secrets/tokens/keys;
- official-use/restricted markings;
- investigation/sealed/professional secrets;
- local paths/usernames;
- hidden metadata/comments/tracked changes;
- embedded files/macros.
- Проверь necessity каждого элемента. Удали, обобщи, псевдонимизируй или замени surrogate ID.
- Для веб-запроса сформируй sanitized query, не позволяющий восстановить конкретное дело.
- Для Git проверь staged set, а не только working tree:
python3 scripts/check_repo_safety.py --staged
- Для DOCX/PDF проверь metadata, comments, hidden text и attachments; после redaction повторно извлеки текст/metadata для контроля.
- Создай disclosure log:
- action/date/actor;
- files/fields;
- class;
- redactions;
- legal/organizational basis;
- recipient/system;
- approval;
- residual risk.
- Если безопасная минимизация невозможна, запрети внешнее действие и предложи локальный/offline путь.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 74 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 64548c6680e5
redaction-and-disclosure is a skill published in the GitHub repository sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab (6 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 783 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
contract-guardian
A contract-review workflow that checks agreements for risks, links important findings to relevant laws, and produces a written review. It covers common agreements such as sales, leases, loans, services, contracting, and intellectual property.
法律周报
A legal-news briefing workflow that finds recent court and legal-practice articles, scores them against selected criteria, and archives chosen items in a local Obsidian notes folder. Obsidian is a local note-taking application.
legal-research
A Chinese-language legal research workflow for finding laws, regulations, court cases, compensation standards, and legal grounds.
legal-citation-comprehensive
A Chinese and foreign legal-citation tool for checking, completing, explaining, and formatting footnotes under the second edition of a legal citation manual. It handles laws, cases, legal documents, and academic sources when the relevant source material is provided.
legal-fact-checker
A Chinese-language fact-checking guide for legal documents such as contracts, case analyses, legal opinions, and legal assignments. It checks provided drafts against factual and legal support without inventing laws, cases, or facts.
workflow-overview
A workflow guide for handling complex legal matters through assessment, issue identification, source research, reasoning, fact checking, and document output.