Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab --skill source-provenancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_labWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/source-provenance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/source-provenance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab/source-provenance.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01017 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00508 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00203 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
source-provenance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Source provenance
Contract
- Job-to-be-done: обеспечить проверяемую цепочку от каждого evidence unit до источника, версии и времени получения.
- Inputs: локальный/веб-источник, origin, дата, версия, locator и условия доступа.
- Outputs: source register rows, hashes/snapshots где допустимо, retrieval metadata и unresolved provenance gaps.
- Evidence and safety: не сохраняй restricted content без разрешения; URL и metadata не должны содержать credentials/PII.
- Stop conditions: останови использование источника, если origin, версия, locator или lawful handling нельзя установить.
- Acceptance test: вручную восстанови один evidence unit по register row и сверь его hash/locator.
Цель
Сделать каждый существенный тезис воспроизводимо проверяемым: источник должен быть идентифицирован, сохранен/зафиксирован, оценен, адресуем и связан с точным доказательственным фрагментом.
Минимальная запись источника
Используй поля из references/source-register-fields.md и matters/_template/sources/REGISTER.csv. Обязательны:
source_id;- title, issuing body/author, type, jurisdiction;
- identifier/requisites;
- publication/adoption date;
- version/as-of и effective dates;
- official/current/draft/repealed status;
- retrieval timestamp UTC;
- official URL либо local path;
- SHA-256 локальной копии, если файл сохраняется;
- legal force/authority;
- reliability и relevance;
- locator scheme;
- limitations.
Процедура
- Инвентаризация. Перечисли предоставленные и найденные материалы. Не анализируй все одинаково глубоко.
- Дедупликация. Сравни identifiers, URL canonicalization, file hashes и содержание. Не удаляй конфликтующие редакции как дубликаты.
- Классификация: primary, supporting, contextual, adverse/counterevidence, unreliable/needs verification, reviewed-not-used.
- Проверка происхождения. Установи официальный орган/издателя, chain of custody для локального файла и дату получения.
- Версионность. Для нормативного акта фиксируй нужную редакцию и период действия; для dataset — schema/methodology version; для веб-страницы — access date и при возможности archived/local snapshot.
- Хэширование. Для разрешенных локальных файлов:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 80 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 9758e6dc251c
source-provenance is a skill published in the GitHub repository sergeionlyart/minius_codex_lab (6 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,017 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A Chinese-language legal research workflow for finding laws, regulations, court cases, compensation standards, and legal grounds.
legal-citation-comprehensive
A Chinese and foreign legal-citation tool for checking, completing, explaining, and formatting footnotes under the second edition of a legal citation manual. It handles laws, cases, legal documents, and academic sources when the relevant source material is provided.
legal-fact-checker
A Chinese-language fact-checking guide for legal documents such as contracts, case analyses, legal opinions, and legal assignments. It checks provided drafts against factual and legal support without inventing laws, cases, or facts.
workflow-overview
A workflow guide for handling complex legal matters through assessment, issue identification, source research, reasoning, fact checking, and document output.
tw-legal-rag
A tool for finding real Taiwan court judgments and legal interpretations with verifiable citations before answering questions about Taiwan law.
legal-research
A structured system for legal research involving laws, court decisions, academic sources, arguments, and evidence. It separates facts, legal claims, scholarly views, and the author's own analysis.