Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sergeyklay/.agents --skill babysit-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sergeyklay/.agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/babysit-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/babysit-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/babysit-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/babysit-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/babysit-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00161 | $0.03737 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.01869 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00747 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00374 |
Grade A, and why
babysit-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Babysit PR - Reviewer Comment Resolution Protocol
Apply changes that genuinely improve the work. Respectfully decline those that do not. Every accept, reject, defer, or skip is backed by documented evidence: Context7 lookups, the project's architecture documentation, or an explicit logical argument grounded in the code. The goal is not to mark every comment resolved; the goal is to ship correct, maintainable work.
This skill carries the protocol. The project supplies the standards: coding conventions, verification commands, architectural invariants, tracker choice, and Context7 mechanics live in the project's context files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, README.md) and architecture documentation. This skill tells you how to reason; the project tells you what to reason about.
Project context is reference material consulted while walking the steps, not a prerequisite to read end-to-end first; the exception for a wrapper prompt that declares its own reading gate is in references/protocol-rationale.md.
Running scripts bundled with this skill
Script paths in this document (e.g. scripts/) are resolved relative to this SKILL.md file, not to your current working directory. If a relative command fails to resolve, prefix it with the path your platform loaded this SKILL.md from.
Fallback. If python3 cannot be located, analyze the script's purpose and logic and execute its intent with available tools, but warn the user that python is not available and the logic was executed with a fallback approach that may not be perfect.
Prerequisites
Before executing any step, confirm:
An authenticated gh CLI for Source B, Context7 and its two-call workflow, the project's documented verification commands, the project's architecture documentation, and no assumption about which issue tracker the project uses. What each one means and where to look for it is in references/setup-and-ingest.md.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/classification-block-template.md 2.9 KB
- assets/evidence-table-template.md 4.1 KB
- assets/summary-template.md 4.3 KB
- references/applying-and-reporting.md 3.4 KB
- references/classification-categories.md 13 KB
- references/context7-triage.md 9.0 KB
- references/protocol-rationale.md 2.6 KB
- references/setup-and-ingest.md 4.8 KB
- references/tracker-triage.md 6.9 KB
- scripts/fetch_pr_comments.py 11 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +4 lines 9e4ee4be706c
- 4d ago Changed · -102 lines 4b16d81a04ea
- 7d ago Changed · +4 lines 6ec387647ff9
- 10d ago First seen · 277 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A f6155d5095a9
babysit-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository sergeyklay/.agents (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 161 tokens to every session and 3,737 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
056-design-avoid-breaking-changes
Use when you need to review a plan, OpenSpec change, specification, or implementation proposal for breaking-change risk across commands, skills, generated outputs, XML sources, README/docs, tests, CI, APIs, schemas, configuration, data, migration, and release guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Review…
longbridge-earnings
Earnings analysis — pre- and post-earnings. Pre-earnings preview: prior-guidance review, recent-events tracking, last call's Q&A, and a key-things-to-watch framework for an upcoming release. Post-earnings: two tiers — a fast in-chat summary card (default) and a full Markdown research report (on request). Covers…
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
review-pr
Review a pull request using specialized reviewer agents.