Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sergeyklay/.agents --skill git-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sergeyklay/.agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/git-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/git-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/git-commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/git-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergeyklay/.agents/git-commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01073 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00429 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
git-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Commit
Workflow
Step 1: Identify changes and group atomically
git status --short
git diff
git diff --cached
Each commit = one logical change. Split unrelated changes into separate commits.
| Situation | Commits |
|---|---|
| New service + its tests | 1 commit |
| New feature + unrelated config fix | 2 commits |
| Multiple files for one feature | 1 commit |
- If user says "commit all" - group into logical atomic commits
- If ambiguous - ask which files and grouping
Step 2: Check branch safety (BLOCKING)
git branch --show-current
Protected branches: main, master, develop, release/*, hotfix/*.
STOP if on a protected branch. Do not commit. Do not proceed to Step 3. Instead:
- Inform the user: "Cannot commit to
<branch>- it is a protected branch." - Create a feature branch:
git checkout -b <type>/<kebab-description> - Only then continue to Step 3.
If on a feature branch: proceed.
Branch naming convention
Format: <type>/<kebab-case-description>
| Type | Use Case | Example |
|---|---|---|
feat |
New feature | feat/bill-reminders |
fix |
Bug fix | fix/null-amount-validation |
refactor |
Code restructuring | refactor/extract-payment-service |
chore |
Maintenance tasks | chore/update-dependencies |
docs |
Documentation | docs/api-reference |
test |
Test additions | test/payment-service-coverage |
Step 3: Match project commit style
git log --format="%s" -20
Identify vocabulary, detail level, scope patterns. Mimic the project's phrasing while following Conventional Commits format.
See references/commit-format.md for type table, rules, and anti-patterns.
Step 4: Stage and commit
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +13 lines d4e35ccbaad6
- 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 6731a07a2415
git-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository sergeyklay/.agents (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,073 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
git-commit-helper
Generate conventional commit messages automatically. Use when user runs git commit, stages changes, or asks for commit message help. Analyzes git diff to create clear, descriptive conventional commit messages. Triggers on git commit, staged changes, commit message requests.
dpf-pr-with-dco
Use when ready to open a DPF pull request.
git-commit
Turn the working changes into one or more atomic commits with well-written messages. Use whenever the user runs /git-commit or asks to commit their work, wrap up a feature, or "commit what I have.".
walk-commits
Side-route skill for an interactive, commit-by-commit comprehension walkthrough of a finished branch before merge. Use when the person about to merge didn't author the diff — or hasn't internalized it — and needs to understand each commit's intent, riskiest line, deliberate oddities, and what's absent by design, with…