Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/commitnpx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00460 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00230 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Commit Changes
You are tasked with creating git commits for the changes made during this session.
Process:
-
Think about what changed:
- Review the conversation history and understand what was accomplished
- Run
git statusto see current changes - Run
git diffto understand the modifications - Consider whether changes should be one commit or multiple logical commits
-
Plan your commit(s):
- Identify which files belong together
- Draft clear, descriptive commit messages
- Use imperative mood in commit messages
- Focus on why the changes were made, not just what
-
Present your plan to the user:
- List the files you plan to add for each commit
- Show the commit message(s) you'll use
- Ask: "I plan to create [N] commit(s) with these changes. Shall I proceed?"
-
Execute upon confirmation:
- Use
git addwith specific files (never use-Aor.) - Create commits with your planned messages
- Show the result with
git log --oneline -n [number]
- Use
-
Generate reasoning (after each commit):
- Run:
bash "$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/.claude/scripts/generate-reasoning.sh" <commit-hash> "<commit-message>" - This captures what was tried during development (build failures, fixes)
- The reasoning file helps future sessions understand past decisions
- Stored in
.git/claude/commits/<hash>/reasoning.md
- Run:
Important:
- NEVER add co-author information or Claude attribution
- Commits should be authored solely by the user
- Do not include any "Generated with Claude" messages
- Do not add "Co-Authored-By" lines
- Write commit messages as if the user wrote them
Remember:
- You have the full context of what was done in this session
- Group related changes together
- Keep commits focused and atomic when possible
- The user trusts your judgment - they asked you to commit
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 51 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 7daa00378d46
commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 (3,934 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 460 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fizzy-workflow
Use for guided Fizzy.do workflows: "set up Fizzy", "configure Fizzy for this project", "sync my work to Fizzy", "review my Fizzy progress", "end of session cleanup". Provides step-by-step guidance for common operations.
commit-archaeologist
Reconstructs why code exists from local git history, including the introducing commit, later changes, current authors, repeated companion files, and likely intent. Use when the user asks "why does this code exist", "who wrote this function and why", or to "explain the history of this function" before a rewrite…
pr-draft-summary
Create the required PR-ready summary block, branch suggestion, title, and draft description for openai-agents-python. Use before the final response whenever the current task changed runtime code, tests, examples, build/test configuration, or docs with behavior impact, regardless of perceived change size and including…
git-commit
Generate conventional commit messages for Java projects. Use when user says "commit", "create commit", "commit changes", or after completing code changes that need to be committed.
ai-meeting
Run structured AI meetings for plans, product ideas, technical designs, business decisions, feature proposals, and strategy choices. Use when the user wants an AI meeting, AI roundtable, multi-agent discussion, debate, proposal review, plan review, decision review, or wants Codex, Claude Code, and other CLI agents to…
fastapi-app
Bootstrap a new FastAPI backend with async SQLAlchemy 2.0, asyncpg, Alembic, Pydantic v2, and no deprecated APIs. Use when the user wants to start, scaffold, or set up a new FastAPI service, a Python REST API, an async backend, or asks to "create a new fastapi app" or "new python backend". Handles JWT auth, layered…