Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vibeeval/vibecosystem --skill commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vibeeval/vibecosystemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00460 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00230 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to commit — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Commit Changes
You are tasked with creating git commits for the changes made during this session.
Process:
-
Think about what changed:
- Review the conversation history and understand what was accomplished
- Run
git statusto see current changes - Run
git diffto understand the modifications - Consider whether changes should be one commit or multiple logical commits
-
Plan your commit(s):
- Identify which files belong together
- Draft clear, descriptive commit messages
- Use imperative mood in commit messages
- Focus on why the changes were made, not just what
-
Present your plan to the user:
- List the files you plan to add for each commit
- Show the commit message(s) you'll use
- Ask: "I plan to create [N] commit(s) with these changes. Shall I proceed?"
-
Execute upon confirmation:
- Use
git addwith specific files (never use-Aor.) - Create commits with your planned messages
- Show the result with
git log --oneline -n [number]
- Use
-
Generate reasoning (after each commit):
- Run:
bash "$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/.claude/scripts/generate-reasoning.sh" <commit-hash> "<commit-message>" - This captures what was tried during development (build failures, fixes)
- The reasoning file helps future sessions understand past decisions
- Stored in
.git/claude/commits/<hash>/reasoning.md
- Run:
Important:
- NEVER add co-author information or Claude attribution
- Commits should be authored solely by the user
- Do not include any "Generated with Claude" messages
- Do not add "Co-Authored-By" lines
- Write commit messages as if the user wrote them
Remember:
- You have the full context of what was done in this session
- Group related changes together
- Keep commits focused and atomic when possible
- The user trusts your judgment - they asked you to commit
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 51 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 7daa00378d46
commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository vibeeval/vibecosystem (529 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 460 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to commit, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
security-pipeline
Use when security verification is needed - pre-commit security checks, vulnerability scanning, STRIDE threat analysis. Integrates with /handoff-verify --security and /commit-push-pr. CWE Top 25 based.
repo-stats-autoupdate
Keeps README badge + inline counts in sync with the real number of skills, agents, graph nodes/edges, communities, converted pipelines, and test inventory. Runs automatically on every commit via a git pre-commit hook. Use when the README drifts from reality or before publishing a release.
caveman-commit
Ultra-compressed commit message generator. Cuts noise from commit messages while preserving intent and reasoning. Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤50 chars, body only when "why" isn't obvious. Use when user says "write a commit", "commit message", "generate commit", "/commit", or invokes /caveman-commit.…
core-workflow
Detailed development workflow patterns, checklists, and standards. Auto-loads for complex tasks, planning, debugging, testing, or when explicit patterns are needed. Contains session protocols, git conventions, security checklists, testing strategy, and communication standards.
git-pushing
Stage, commit, and push git changes with conventional commit messages. Use when user wants to commit and push changes, mentions pushing to remote, or asks to save and push their work. Also activates when user says "push changes", "commit and push", "push this", "push to github", or similar git workflow requests.
issues-workflow
Plan and track work using a GitHub Issues-first workflow with sub-issue hierarchies, issue-branch-PR lifecycle, and auto-close on merge.