Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sfc-gh-dflippo/snowflake-dbt-demo --skill migrate-etlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sfc-gh-dflippo/snowflake-dbt-demoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sfc-gh-dflippo/snowflake-dbt-demo/migrate-etl)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sfc-gh-dflippo/snowflake-dbt-demo/migrate-etl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sfc-gh-dflippo/snowflake-dbt-demo/migrate-etl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sfc-gh-dflippo/snowflake-dbt-demo/migrate-etl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sfc-gh-dflippo/snowflake-dbt-demo/migrate-etl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.02850 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01425 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00570 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00285 |
Grade A, and why
migrate-etl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Migrate ETL
Wraps actions/etl-stabilization/SKILL.md so it runs as a state-machine task on a single ETL code unit.
The platform of an ETL code unit is recorded on its registry entry as source.platform (ssis, informatica, …). etl-stabilization already covers every supported platform via per-platform profiles in actions/etl-stabilization/platforms/. This skill does not replicate that work — it only:
- Resolves the converted-artifacts folder and source-definition paths from the registry entry.
- Invokes
etl-stabilizationagainst them. - Updates
codeStatus.stabilizationon the registry entry when etl-stabilization finishes (or the unit is excluded).
Scope
Stabilization for this version means: run etl-stabilization until its Final Validation phase reports clean. That covers everything etl-stabilization does — scan, ROADMAP, phased TDD across orchestration elements and dbt sub-projects, EWI fixes, etc.
After stabilization: the unit advances to deploy. Deploying the stabilized ETL to Snowflake is handled by scai code deploy through the deploy tool (see Step 4), not by this skill and not by hand-running snow. Deploy is no longer terminal for ETL — once deployed, the unit advances to etlSeed and etlValidate to compare the live source package against the Snowflake output.
This skill is the orchestrated (registry-backed) entry point for ETL stabilization. It claims the unit and records the result on the registry, then delegates the actual fixing to etl-stabilization.
Step 0: Claim Ownership
The ETL unit must be claimed before stabilization begins, so it is registered in MIGRATION_REGISTRY.claims, shows the current user as owner, and appears in my_objects_summary alongside SQL objects. Resolve <etl_id> first: the executor passes object_id; if entered by name ("fix ETL package …"), locate the unit via migration_status(mode="my_objects_summary") (already-claimed) or migration_status(mode="next_objects") (not yet claimed).
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 137 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 4fdae7d6a3c0
migrate-etl is a skill published in the GitHub repository sfc-gh-dflippo/snowflake-dbt-demo (33 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 2,850 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
Other skills, from other repositories
writing-evals
Scaffolds evaluation suites for the Axiom AI SDK. Generates eval files, scorers, flag schemas, and config from natural-language descriptions. Use when creating evals, writing scorers, setting up flag schemas, or configuring axiom.config.ts.
ai-observability-promptfoo
Testing and evaluation framework for LLM prompts and applications -- promptfooconfig.yaml, assertions, model-graded evals, red teaming, CI/CD integration, custom providers, and comparative evaluation.
evo-simpo-loss
Implement the SimPO (Simple Preference Optimization) loss function for the SimPOTrainer class. Use when reproducing the SimPO paper's loss computation, injecting the simpoloss method into simpotrainer.py, running unit tests, and generating validated loss outputs.
deep-plan
Creates detailed, sectionized, TDD-oriented implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.
eval
Formal evaluation framework implementing eval-driven development (EDD). Define evals before coding, run continuously, track pass@k metrics.
wave-execution-framework-v2
Use when executing multi-wave engineering work needing strict TDD, bug-capture/fix split, quality gates, and orchestrated teams with per-agent Opus-advisor / Sonnet-executor model routing.