Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents --skill comms-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/comms-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/comms-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/comms-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/comms-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents/comms-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00125 | $0.01147 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00574 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00229 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
comms-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Communications Operations
Step 0 (always first): Load brand context
Before producing any deliverable, look for a brand-context.md file in the user's project root (also check ./.claude/brand-context.md and ./docs/brand-context.md). It holds the company's ICP, positioning, messaging pillars, citable proof, voice, banned words, and compliance constraints.
- If it exists: read it in full and treat it as binding for this run. Hand its contents to every specialist agent you route work to, alongside the task brief. Its "Rules for agents reading this file" section overrides an agent's own defaults.
- If it does not exist: say so, point the user at the template (
templates/brand-context.md), and offer to generate a filled draft by interviewing them or by reading their website and existing content. Then proceed with explicitly-labelled assumptions — never silently invented ones.
Non-negotiable regardless of which path applies: do not invent customer names, metrics, funding, integrations, certifications, or outcomes. Only proof recorded in brand-context.md (or supplied directly in the request) may be used as fact. Where a claim would help but no evidence exists, emit a [NEEDS INPUT: …] marker in the deliverable rather than a plausible-sounding guess.
What This Is
Communications Operations speaks in the company's voice to third-party gatekeepers — the journalists and industry analysts whose judgments shape reputation and enterprise shortlists for years. It covers the highest-stakes writing a SaaS company does (announcements, crisis statements) and the long-cycle analyst programs that decide whether you appear in the evaluations enterprise buyers filter on.
The Team: 2 Specialist Agents
| # | Agent | File | What They Do |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Relations Strategist | agents/comms-pr-strategist.md |
Owns earned-media strategy and press relationships, announcement architecture and press releases, embargo and exclusive strategy, executive visibility and spokesperson prep, crisis and issues communications, and message discipline in third-party coverage. |
| 2 | Analyst Relations Manager | agents/comms-analyst-relations-manager.md |
Owns the industry-analyst program: the standing briefing and inquiry calendar, analyst relationship map, evaluation submissions (Magic Quadrant, Forrester Wave, IDC MarketScape) with their long lead times and evidence requirements, reprint and citation rights, and feeding analyst insight back into positioning. |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 61 lines · 125 tokens per session scan A d63ad76f6e87
comms-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 1,147 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
linkedin-humanizer
Remove the AI tells human readers and LinkedIn's AI-slop filter react to in a post or comment: 2026 vocabulary by paragraph density, reveal bridges, staccato fragments, stacked triads, performed sincerity. Tiered rewriter (forensic / strict / aesthetic / all) plus --mode audit pass-fail review and --mode profile voice…
linkedin-marketing
Plan, draft, audit, and publish LinkedIn posts and comments. Use when the user wants to write a viral LinkedIn post, draft a comment or reply on any LinkedIn post URL, audit a draft against 2026 algorithm heuristics, remove AI tells, extract hook formulas from viral posts, or plan a week of content. Powered by the…
linkedin-reply-handler
Draft a reply to a specific existing LinkedIn comment from its URL. Use when the user wants to reply to a comment on any post, or follow up after an author replied to them. Parses the commentUrn, resolves the correct parentComment target (LinkedIn flattens threads to 2 levels), and posts via Publora on approval. Not…
linkedin-post-writer
Draft a new LinkedIn post from scratch using one of 20 2026 hook formulas (anaphora, R.I.P., time-anchor, curiosity-gap, contrarian, controlled A/B, false-binary, and more) plus a founders-edition angle library, picked by engagement goal (comments, reposts, likes, saves). Runs the humanizer pass and schedules via…
linkedin-comment-drafter
Draft a LinkedIn comment on someone else's post from its URL, or reshare (repost) it to your feed with optional commentary. Use when the user pastes a post URL and asks to comment, engage, be first commenter, or repost with their thoughts. Produces 1-3 variants in the user's voice, picks a reaction, and publishes via…
linkedin-content-planner
Generate a 7-day LinkedIn content plan from a theme, audience, and pillars. Produces per-day post pillar, format, hook type, CTA, posting time, daily comment targets, and a weekly inbound-readiness check. Use when the user wants to plan a week or month of content, not draft a single post.