Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shawnclybor/clybor-claude-toolingnpx agentmods add skills/shawnclybor/clybor-claude-tooling/writing-qualityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shawnclybor/clybor-claude-tooling/writing-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shawnclybor/clybor-claude-tooling/writing-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shawnclybor/clybor-claude-tooling/writing-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shawnclybor/clybor-claude-tooling/writing-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shawnclybor/clybor-claude-tooling/writing-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00169 | $0.06337 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00068 | $0.02535 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.01267 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00634 |
Grade A, and why
writing-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 567 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Quality — AI-ism Audit & Rewrite
You are editing content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms") that make text sound machine-generated. This matters because client-facing deliverables can't afford AI-scented prose. AI-isms undermine the expert authority a paid deliverable is supposed to convey.
Modes
rewrite (default) — Flag AI-isms and rewrite the text to fix them. Use this during
deliverable curation (Phase 1) and email drafting.
detect — Flag AI-isms only, no rewriting. Use when auditing existing content, when
patterns might be intentional, or for a quick check before sending.
Trigger detect mode when the user says "detect," "flag only," "audit only," "just flag,"
"scan," or similar. Default to rewrite mode otherwise.
In rewrite mode:
- Audit and identify every AI-ism, citing specific text
- Rewrite to remove all AI-isms
- If the content cites external sources, run the citation check below before returning it
- Return the cleaned text with a brief summary of major changes
- If the user corrects the result, log it:
bash scripts/log-correction.sh "<pattern-slug>" "<project>"— a REPEAT alert (exit 2) means propose the source-level fix (voice guide, template, this skill's rules), not another draft fix
In detect mode:
- Audit and identify every AI-ism, citing specific text
- Group by severity (P0, P1, P2)
- Note which flags are clear problems vs. judgment calls
- If the content cites external sources, run the citation check below
Context Profiles
Auto-detect from content cues. The user can override.
deliverable (default for anything going to a client) — Strictest. All rules at full
strength. Consulting deliverables can't afford any AI smell. Clients pay for expert
analysis, not generated filler.
email — Client correspondence. Strict on P0 and P1, relaxed on P2 structural issues
(short emails don't need paragraph variation). Hedging rules relaxed slightly — "perhaps"
is sometimes appropriate in diplomatic emails.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +60 lines 79f1bee956bf
- 2mo ago Changed · +95 lines a11d22202715
- 2mo ago First seen · 412 lines · 169 tokens per session scan A 81af4c28f0eb
writing-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository shawnclybor/clybor-claude-tooling (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 169 tokens to every session and 6,337 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
writing-quality compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| writing-qualityshawnclybor/clybor-claude-tooling | Skill | 6 | yesterday | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| autonomousSienkLogic/plan-build-run | Skill | 18 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| quickSienkLogic/plan-build-run | Skill | 18 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| auditSienkLogic/plan-build-run | Skill | 18 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| debugSienkLogic/plan-build-run | Skill | 18 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| exploreSienkLogic/plan-build-run | Skill | 18 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| resumeSienkLogic/plan-build-run | Skill | 18 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code |