Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add shennawardana23/skillme --skill genkit-go-flowsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shennawardana23/skillmeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shennawardana23/skillme/genkit-go-flows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shennawardana23/skillme/genkit-go-flows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shennawardana23/skillme/genkit-go-flows/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shennawardana23/skillme/genkit-go-flows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shennawardana23/skillme/genkit-go-flows.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01655 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00827 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00331 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
genkit-go-flows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Genkit for Go: Flows, Prompts, and Tools
Genkit (github.com/firebase/genkit/go) is Google/Firebase's application
framework for building AI features — flows, prompt management, structured
generation, tool calling, RAG, and evals — with first-class Go support
alongside JS/TS. It is not the same tool as adk-go-agent-builder's Agent
Development Kit: Genkit is the broader app-framework layer (any AI feature,
not just autonomous agents), while ADK is specifically for building
orchestrated, tool-using agents. A service can reasonably use both — Genkit
for its prompt/generation plumbing and observability, ADK for the parts
that are genuinely agentic.
Defining a flow
A flow is Genkit's typed, traceable unit of AI-feature logic — register it
against a *genkit.Genkit instance rather than calling generation
functions ad hoc, so it shows up in traces and can be run standalone via
the CLI:
g := genkit.Init(ctx)
flow := genkit.DefineFlow(g, "summarizeReservation", func(ctx context.Context, input ReservationInput) (string, error) {
resp, err := genkit.Generate(ctx, g,
ai.WithPrompt("Summarize this reservation in one sentence: %+v", input),
)
if err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("generate summary: %w", err)
}
return resp.Text(), nil
})
Pass g (the *Genkit instance) explicitly into every call that needs
it — it is Genkit's central action registry (flows, prompts, tools all
register against it). Storing it as a package-level global instead of
threading it through breaks the documented pattern and makes a service
harder to test with an isolated registry per test.
Running with traces (the dev loop that actually works)
genkit start -- go run . # traced, with Dev UI
genkit flow:run summarizeReservation '{"hotelId":"h1"}' -- go run . # traced, non-interactive
go run . on its own does not capture Genkit dev traces — only running
under genkit start (or the equivalent genkit flow:run for a single,
self-terminating invocation) wires up the trace collector. Debugging a
flow by running the binary directly is debugging blind: no trace, no Dev
UI inspection of the actual prompt/response the model saw.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 158 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A a873f36e7c42
genkit-go-flows is a skill published in the GitHub repository shennawardana23/skillme (2 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,655 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-engineering
Reviews and guides LLM/AI application engineering: prompt design, prompt caching, multimodal inputs, RAG, agent loops and tool design, resilience (rate limits, retries, fallbacks), memory, model migration, evals, testing, prompt-injection defence, and observability. Synthesises practices from Anthropic, OpenAI…
ai-llm-skills-guide
Guide for AI Agents and LLM development skills including RAG, multi-agent systems, prompt engineering, memory systems, and context engineering.
flockion_engineering_ai
Forces the simplest, shortest, safest AI solution that actually works. Lazy senior-engineer pragmatism for LLM features, agents, RAG, tool-calling, and prompts. Use a prompt before a chain, retrieval before fine-tuning, deterministic code before an agent, and one tool before a tool framework. Keep critical business…
performant-ai
Strategies for high-performance AI/LLM systems (Context Management, Prompt Engineering, RAG, Inference Tuning).
ai-product
Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production. This skill covers LLM integration patterns, RAG architecture, prompt engineering that scales, AI UX that users trust, and cost optimization that doesn't bankrupt you. Use when "keywords…
ai-engineering-toolkit
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, an.