Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/saas-securitynpx skills add ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe --skill saas-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShieldNet-360/secure-vibeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/saas-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/saas-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/saas-security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.02020 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.01010 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00404 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
saas-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SaaS Integration Security
Rules (for AI agents)
ALWAYS
- Verify an inbound webhook against that vendor's documented scheme, and do not generalize from another one. Vendors differ in the header, in the secret, and — the part that breaks a generalized implementation — in the canonical string that gets signed. Some sign the raw body, some sign a version prefix plus a timestamp plus the body, some sign the HTTP method and path as well. Read the vendor's page for the vendor you are integrating; a signature routine copied from a different vendor produces a receiver that rejects every legitimate event, and the fix someone reaches for is to turn verification off.
- Verify against the raw request body, exactly as received, before any parsing or re-serialization. A framework that decodes JSON and re-encodes it changes whitespace and key order, and the HMAC no longer matches — which again ends with verification being disabled rather than fixed.
- Check the timestamp the vendor sends and reject requests outside a short window, then reject replays inside it by recording delivery or event ids. A signature is valid forever; the window narrows the replay opportunity and the id store closes it.
- Compare signatures in constant time.
crypto-misuseowns the comparison API for each language. - Treat the signature as proof of who sent the payload, not who the payload is
about. This is the distinction that matters most in this domain: a verified Zoom or
Calendly or HubSpot event genuinely came from that vendor, and the
email,from, or custom fields inside it may still be attacker-chosen — anyone who can book a meeting or submit a form controls them. Resolve the subject to a canonical id server-side.auth-securityowns the general rule for producer-asserted identity. - Give each integration its own credential, and each environment its own. A refresh token, connected app, or service account shared between dev and prod puts production credentials inside dev's blast radius, and a credential shared between integrations gives each the union of what any of them needs. Name service accounts for their purpose so a later reviewer can tell what revoking one would break.
- Request the narrowest scope you actually call, and prefer a read-only variant where the platform offers one. Scopes are granted once, at consent, and nobody revisits them; a scope requested speculatively is a permanent grant.
- Treat a bulk export of employee, customer or billing records as a data boundary: log the authenticated principal, the query, the row count and the destination, and alert on volume that departs from that integration's own baseline. For HRIS and ERP systems this is the primary control — the integration is authorized, and the question is how much it took.
- Authenticate a SCIM or directory-sync endpoint you expose, rate-limit it, and audit every user and group write. Note what the major identity providers actually send: a static OAuth bearer token, configured once in their admin console. Client certificates are generally not on offer, so the practical controls are a high-entropy token you can rotate, a source-address restriction where the IdP publishes ranges, and treating every write as an audit event.
What ships with it
17 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/verifying-findings.md 4.6 KB
- rules/atlassian.json 6.2 KB
- rules/bamboohr.json 3.7 KB
- rules/calendly.json 4.4 KB
- rules/google_chat.json 3.1 KB
- rules/google_workspace.json 7.1 KB
- rules/hubspot.json 4.4 KB
- rules/larksuite.json 4.8 KB
- rules/microsoft_teams.json 4.8 KB
- rules/netsuite.json 5.8 KB
- rules/notion.json 4.1 KB
- rules/odoo.json 4.6 KB
- rules/salesforce.json 6.0 KB
- rules/slack.json 6.0 KB
- rules/workday.json 4.9 KB
- rules/zoom.json 5.3 KB
- tests/corpus.json 4.2 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 141 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 9a0c0471121b
saas-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe (22 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 2,020 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
documenter-vitepress
Use when setting up or developing a Julia based documentation site with DocumenterVitepress.jl. Also use when the user mentions DocumenterVitepress, VitePress for Julia docs, or wants to preview docs locally with hot reload.
agent-teacher
Teach a concept through a runnable code example plus a structured walkthrough, instead of a wall of definitions. Trigger whenever the user wants to understand a technical concept — phrases like "解释一下 X / X 是什么 / 教我 X / X 怎么工作 / 这个 X 是啥 / 我不太懂 X", or "explain X / what is X / teach me X / how does X work / help me…
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-c2-frameworks
Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-z-wave
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting…