offensive-api-abuse

offensive-api-abuse is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from SnailSploit/Claude-Red. It costs 184 tokens per session (5,750 once invoked), scanned B, original, MIT.

A guide for authorized security testing of APIs, including attacks that misuse business workflows and GraphQL features. APIs are interfaces that let software exchange data and actions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Mapping APIs, testing workflow manipulation, race conditions, tokens, GraphQL abuse, data exposure, and service-disruption risks.
Why use it?
It helps find flaws that ordinary scanners can miss when an attack depends on the order, state, or combination of valid requests.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is jwt_tool "$JWT_TOKEN" -I -hc kid -hv "../../dev/null" -S hs256 -p "".

Good fit Mapping APIs, testing workflow manipulation, race conditions, tokens, GraphQL abuse, data exposure, and service-disruption risks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
About the project

claude-red is a library of structured skills that give Claude specialized offensive-security methods for areas such as web vulnerabilities, shellcode, exploit development, and identity systems. It is intended for authorized red-team work, bug-bounty triage, security research, CTF preparation, and operator training. Its catalogue contains the project's skills for loading these security specializations into Claude.

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 7,620 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-api-abuse

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for offensive-api-abuse

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-api-abuse/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-api-abuse)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-api-abuse"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-api-abuse/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for offensive-api-abuse

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-api-abuse"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-api-abuse.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 184 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,750 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 14 findings, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Server-Side Request Forgery · line 215
    Code accesses a cloud instance metadata endpoint (e.g. 169.254.169.254). A single request can return temporary IAM credentials, making this a high-value SSRF target for credential theft.
    Fix: Remove access to cloud metadata endpoints unless strictly required. If metadata is needed, restrict it (e.g. IMDSv2 with hop limit) and never expose returned credentials.
  • high Memory Poisoning · line 233
    Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.
    Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 34
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 39
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 45
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 198
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 221
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 53
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 101
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 127
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 143
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 276
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 371
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 426
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00184 $0.05750
Opus 5.5 $0.00074 $0.02300
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00037 $0.01150
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00575

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 42cd1e419aea, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

offensive-api-abuse scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Cloud metadata endpointmediumServer-side request forgery

One request to 169.254.169.254 can return temporary IAM credentials.

"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/"

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

curl -s -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
Skills/api/offensive-api-abuse/SKILL.md · 500 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 500 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Offensive API Abuse and Advanced Exploitation

You are conducting authorized security assessments targeting the business logic layer of API-driven applications. Traditional vulnerability scanners miss the attack patterns in this skill because they require understanding of application workflows, state transitions, and trust relationships between API endpoints. Your goal is to identify vulnerabilities that allow financial manipulation, data exfiltration through legitimate channels, privilege escalation via workflow abuse, and service disruption through logic-layer attacks.

Quick Workflow

  1. Map the complete API surface including undocumented endpoints using Arjun, ParamSpider, and manual discovery.
  2. Model the business workflows: identify multi-step transactions, state machines, and trust chains between endpoints.
  3. Test each workflow for race conditions using parallel request techniques.
  4. Extract and analyze JWTs for algorithm confusion, weak signing, and claim injection opportunities.
  5. If GraphQL is present, test batching for brute-force amplification, query depth for DoS, and introspection for schema leakage.
  6. Probe pagination for data enumeration and exfiltration opportunities.
  7. Test webhook configurations for SSRF and callback hijacking.
  8. Search for API key leakage in client code, error responses, and public repositories.
  9. Verify all discovered endpoints for authorization consistency.
  10. Document business impact for each finding with financial or operational consequence estimates.

Business Logic Bypass via API Chaining

Business logic vulnerabilities emerge when individual API endpoints are secure in isolation but the workflow connecting them has exploitable gaps. You identify these by mapping the intended transaction flow and then deviating from it.

# E-commerce checkout bypass
# Normal flow: add_to_cart -> apply_coupon -> calculate_total -> pay -> confirm
# Attack: skip payment and go directly to confirm

curl -s -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"product_id": "PROD-001", "quantity": 1}' \
  "https://target.example.com/api/v1/cart/items" | jq .

curl -s -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"coupon_code": "SAVE20"}' \
  "https://target.example.com/api/v1/cart/coupon" | jq .

# Skip payment -- attempt direct order confirmation
curl -s -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"cart_id": "CART-12345"}' \
  "https://target.example.com/api/v1/orders/confirm" | jq .

Read the full file on GitHub · 500 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 500 lines · 184 tokens per session scan B 42cd1e419aea

Subscribe to this mod's changes

offensive-api-abuse is a skill published in the GitHub repository SnailSploit/Claude-Red (7,620 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 184 tokens to every session and 5,750 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (cloud metadata endpoint, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.