Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit/writing-orchestrationnpx skills add robertguss/claude-code-toolkit --skill writing-orchestrationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/robertguss/claude-code-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit/writing-orchestration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit/writing-orchestration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit/writing-orchestration.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01769 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00885 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00354 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
writing-orchestration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 238 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Orchestration Skill
A complete orchestration system for complex writing workflows. This skill provides the strategic layer that coordinates agents, applies writing strategies, and ensures content quality.
When to Use This Skill
This skill applies when:
- Coordinating multiple writing agents
- Applying strategic writing decisions
- Assessing content readiness before drafting
- Selecting and applying writing strategies
- Running quality checkpoints on drafts
Two-Agent Architecture
Complex writing benefits from separation of concerns:
Orchestrator Role
- Classifies requests (information vs. content)
- Applies two-gate assessment
- Gathers research and context
- Hands off to writer when ready
- Never creates content directly
Writer Role
- Creates drafts using strategies
- Applies style guides
- Produces variations (EXPLORATION mode)
- Refines based on feedback (REFINEMENT mode)
- Uses tools for all content (never in chat)
User Request
↓
[Orchestrator] → Classify → Research → Two-Gate Assessment
↓
├── Not Ready → Gather more material/clarity
↓
└── Ready → Handoff to Writer
↓
[Writer] → Apply Strategies → Create Drafts
↓
Quality Checkpoints → Output
Two-Gate Content Readiness Assessment
Before any content creation, apply this assessment:
Gate 1: Material Sufficiency
Question: "Could the writer create this without inventing facts?"
| Outcome | Action |
|---|---|
| ✓ Pass | Have concrete examples, data, quotes available |
| ✗ Fail | Need to research/gather material first |
Pass signals:
- Specific examples available
- Data points confirmed
- Expert quotes accessible
- No major claims need fabrication
Gate 2: Message Clarity
Question: "Do we know EXACTLY what message to convey?"
| Outcome | Action |
|---|---|
| ✓ Pass | Clear, specific communication goal |
| ✗ Fail | Need to interview for clarity |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 238 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 9b8409fac3c5
writing-orchestration is a skill published in the GitHub repository robertguss/claude-code-toolkit (108 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,769 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
offensive-vuln-classes
Exploit development curriculum covering core vulnerability classes with real-world CVE case studies: stack/heap buffer overflows, use-after-free, integer overflows, format strings, type confusion, and race conditions. Use when learning or teaching vuln classes, researching specific CVE patterns, or building exploit…
offensive-edr-evasion
EDR evasion offensive checklist: hook unhooking (user/kernel), direct syscalls, PPID spoofing, process injection variants, AMSI bypass, ETW patching, memory encryption, and behavior-based evasion. Use when planning EDR bypass during red team engagements or researching AV/EDR evasion techniques.
offensive-mitigations
Security mitigation reference and bypass catalog: ASLR, DEP/NX, RELRO, stack canaries, CFI, sandboxing, seccomp. Covers both detection of enabled mitigations and known bypass techniques. Use when assessing target hardening or planning exploit mitigation bypasses.
offensive-exploit-development
Exploit development operational guide: environment setup, debugging workflow, PoC development lifecycle, writing reliable exploits, using pwntools/pwndbg, heap exploitation techniques, and weaponization considerations. Use when actively developing exploits or setting up an exploit dev environment.
offensive-tls-attacks
Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers…
offensive-advanced-redteam
Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC…