offensive-edr-evasion

offensive-edr-evasion is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from SnailSploit/Claude-Red. It costs 0 tokens per session (19,599 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An offensive security checklist about avoiding detection by endpoint detection and response tools, which monitor computers for suspicious activity. It covers techniques involving process behavior, system calls, and memory.

In plain words
What is it for?
Planning or researching EDR-evasion techniques in approved security assessments, including hook changes, process injection, AMSI bypasses, and behavior-based evasion.
Why use it?
It organizes topics to consider during authorized red-team work or research into how security defenses detect attacks.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Planning or researching EDR-evasion techniques in approved security assessments, including hook changes, process injection, AMSI bypasses, and behavior-based evasion.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-edr-evasion
About the project

claude-red is a library of structured skills that give Claude specialized offensive-security methods for areas such as web vulnerabilities, shellcode, exploit development, and identity systems. It is intended for authorized red-team work, bug-bounty triage, security research, CTF preparation, and operator training. Its catalogue contains the project's skills for loading these security specializations into Claude.

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 3,048 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add SnailSploit/Claude-Red --skill offensive-edr-evasion
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for offensive-edr-evasion

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-edr-evasion/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-edr-evasion)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-edr-evasion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-edr-evasion/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for offensive-edr-evasion

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-edr-evasion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snailsploit/claude-red/offensive-edr-evasion.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 19,599 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 5 findings, up to critical

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • critical YARA Match · line 1498
    YARA rule matched a known malware signature (reverse shell, backdoor, ransomware, C2 framework, or info stealer).
    Fix: Remove the malware payload or compromised file entirely. Investigate how it entered the skill and audit all other artifacts for additional indicators of compromise.
  • high YARA Match · line 640
    YARA rule matched a known malware signature (reverse shell, backdoor, ransomware, C2 framework, or info stealer).
    Fix: Remove the malware payload or compromised file entirely. Investigate how it entered the skill and audit all other artifacts for additional indicators of compromise.
  • high Prompt Injection · line 1207
    Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
  • high YARA Match · line 1504
    YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).
    Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
  • high YARA Match · line 1551
    YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).
    Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.19599
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.09799
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.03920
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.01960

Measured 9d ago against content hash e0131dc7f57f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

offensive-edr-evasion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Skills/infrastructure/offensive-edr-evasion/SKILL.md · 1,805 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,805 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

SKILL: Endpoint Detection and Response

Metadata

Description

EDR evasion offensive checklist: hook unhooking (user/kernel), direct syscalls, PPID spoofing, process injection variants, AMSI bypass, ETW patching, memory encryption, and behavior-based evasion. Use when planning EDR bypass during red team engagements or researching AV/EDR evasion techniques.

Trigger Phrases

Use this skill when the conversation involves any of: EDR evasion, EDR bypass, hook unhooking, direct syscalls, PPID spoofing, process injection, AMSI bypass, ETW patch, memory encryption, AV evasion, behavioral evasion, red team evasion

Instructions for Claude

When this skill is active:

  1. Load and apply the full methodology below as your operational checklist
  2. Follow steps in order unless the user specifies otherwise
  3. For each technique, consider applicability to the current target/context
  4. Track which checklist items have been completed
  5. Suggest next steps based on findings

Full Methodology

Endpoint Detection and Response

Fundamentals

AV vs EDR

Antivirus (preventive approach):

  • Static Analysis: Matching known signatures in files
  • Dynamic Analysis: Limited behavioral monitoring/sandboxing
  • Effective against known threats, weaker against advanced attacks

EDR (proactive & investigative approach):

  • Continuous endpoint monitoring
  • Behavioral analysis at kernel level
  • Anomaly detection and post-compromise visibility
  • Prioritizes incident response and investigation

Windows Execution Flow

Windows program execution follows a hierarchical flow:

  1. Applications - User programs like firefox.exe
  2. DLLs - Libraries providing Windows functionality without direct low-level access
  3. Kernel32.dll - Core DLL for memory management, process/thread creation
  4. Ntdll.dll - Lowest user-mode DLL that exposes the NT API interface to the kernel
  5. Kernel - Core OS component with unrestricted hardware access

Read the full file on GitHub · 1,805 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 1,805 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e0131dc7f57f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

offensive-edr-evasion is a skill published in the GitHub repository SnailSploit/Claude-Red (3,048 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 19,599 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

app-store-opportunity-research

Full-pipeline iOS App Store opportunity research. Discovers underserved niches, analyzes competitor gaps, estimates revenue, produces scored top-3 opportunity reports, and writes MVP PRDs — all through browser and web research. Use when the user wants to find profitable iOS app ideas, research App Store charts…

robertguss/claude-code-toolkit · 130 tokens

code-documenter

Expert documentation generator for coding projects. Analyzes codebases to create thorough, comprehensive documentation for developers and users. Supports incremental updates, multi-audience documentation, architecture decision records, and documentation health tracking. Works with any project type (APIs, CLIs, web…

robertguss/claude-code-toolkit · 87 tokens

ghost-writer

Produce first drafts that match a writer's authentic voice using their Voice DNA Document. Consumes DNA documents from writing-dna-discovery skill. Generates 2 meaningfully different drafts with headlines, confidence assessment, decision notes, and DNA refinement suggestions. Collaborative partner that evaluates…

robertguss/claude-code-toolkit · 77 tokens

app-store-listing-optimizer

Optimize iOS App Store and Google Play Store listings for maximum discoverability and conversion. Perform competitive keyword research, craft keyword-optimized titles/subtitles/descriptions, design screenshot sequences, and generate A/B test variants. Use when the user has a built app and needs to write or improve…

robertguss/claude-code-toolkit · 137 tokens

paywall-pricing-optimizer

Design effective paywalls, structure subscription tiers, and optimize pricing for mobile apps. Covers monetization model selection, paywall screen design, pricing psychology, A/B testing strategy, and RevenueCat/StoreKit/Google Billing integration. Use when the user wants to monetize an app, design a paywall, choose…

robertguss/claude-code-toolkit · 143 tokens

voice-capture

This skill should be used when extracting voice profiles from sample text, creating voice documentation, or matching a specific writing style. It applies when users provide sample text and want to capture the voice for future use.

robertguss/claude-code-toolkit · 45 tokens