Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/template-injectionnpx skills add ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe --skill template-injectiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShieldNet-360/secure-vibeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/template-injection)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/template-injection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/template-injection.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.02035 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.01018 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00407 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
template-injection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Template Injection (SSTI)
Rules (for AI agents)
ALWAYS
- Pass user data as bound values, never into the template source string. This
is the whole skill in one line:
render(tmpl, {"name": name})is safe,render("Hello " + name)is SSTI. The compiler treats its source as code, and the context as data — so the only question that matters about any user value is which of the two it reaches. - Keep the set of template sources static and trusted, loaded from files or constants. A template body read from a database column, an API response, or a request field is attacker-supplied code, whatever the column is called.
- Choose the template by name from an allowlist, never by a name the caller
supplies.
render_template(user_value)and{% include user_value %}are the same vulnerability as a user-supplied body: the caller picks which code runs, and on many engines the name resolves as a filesystem path, which makes it an arbitrary-file read as well. - Minimize the render context. Pass the specific values the template needs, never
the ambient objects — application config, settings, the request,
self, a module, a live ORM instance. This is the control that still holds when a sandbox is escaped: an engine that cannot execute code can still print whatever it can reach, and configuration objects hold database URLs and signing keys. - Treat a second render pass as compilation of whatever survived the first. If
rendered output is parsed again, a user value that was inert data on pass one is
{{ }}code on pass two. The fix is architectural — stop re-parsing rendered output. Neutralizing metacharacters before the second pass is a fallback that has to enumerate every delimiter of every engine, including ones a custom delimiter configuration introduces, and two adjacent fields can produce a delimiter that neither of them contains. - Bound the render: cap iteration counts, recursion depth, include depth, output size, and wall-clock time. A template is a denial-of-service sink even where it is not a code-execution one, and an unbounded loop count is one request that allocates until the process dies.
- Keep autoescaping on, and know that autoescape is an XSS control rather than an
SSTI one — it escapes what the template prints, not what the template is.
frontend-securityowns output encoding and the raw-output opt-outs (|safe,{{{ }}},template.HTML) that turn it off per value.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 136 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 929a63c8618e
template-injection is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe (22 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 2,035 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
documenter-vitepress
Use when setting up or developing a Julia based documentation site with DocumenterVitepress.jl. Also use when the user mentions DocumenterVitepress, VitePress for Julia docs, or wants to preview docs locally with hot reload.
agent-teacher
Teach a concept through a runnable code example plus a structured walkthrough, instead of a wall of definitions. Trigger whenever the user wants to understand a technical concept — phrases like "解释一下 X / X 是什么 / 教我 X / X 怎么工作 / 这个 X 是啥 / 我不太懂 X", or "explain X / what is X / teach me X / how does X work / help me…
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-c2-frameworks
Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-z-wave
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting…