Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shinpr/codex-workflows/recipe-add-integration-testsnpx skills add shinpr/codex-workflows --skill recipe-add-integration-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shinpr/codex-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/codex-workflows/recipe-add-integration-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/codex-workflows/recipe-add-integration-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shinpr/codex-workflows/recipe-add-integration-tests.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01553 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00776 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00311 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
recipe-add-integration-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Required Skills [LOAD BEFORE EXECUTION]
- [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE]
testing— repository-aware test execution - [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE]
integration-e2e-testing— value-based integration/E2E selection - [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE]
subagents-orchestration-guide— review resolution and agent coordination - [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE]
llm-friendly-context— task file contract
Spawn rule: every spawn_agent call uses fork_turns="none" so the subagent receives only the task message and explicitly provided context.
Context: Test addition workflow for existing implementations
Orchestrator Definition
Core Identity: Coordinate test addition, perform lightweight evidence collection and routing directly, and invoke specialists for generation, implementation, and review judgment.
Execution Plan: Reuse the active execution plan. When the workflow has multiple dependent actions and no plan exists, create one that tracks them through final verification.
Why Spawn: Orchestrator's context is shared across all steps. Direct implementation consumes context needed for review and quality check phases. Task files create context boundaries. Subagents work in isolated context.
Execution Method:
- Skeleton generation -> Spawn acceptance-test-generator agent
- Task file creation -> Orchestrator creates directly (minimal context usage)
- Test implementation -> Spawn task-executor agent
- Test review -> Spawn integration-test-reviewer agent
- Quality checks -> Spawn quality-fixer agent
Document paths: $ARGUMENTS
Prerequisites
- At least one Design Doc must exist (created manually or via reverse-engineer)
- Existing implementation to test
Execution Flow
Step 0: Prepare Context
Use the llm-friendly-context Task File Contract in Step 3.
Step 1: Discover and Validate Documents
# Verify at least one document path was provided
test -n "$ARGUMENTS" || { echo "ERROR: No document paths provided"; exit 1; }
# Verify provided paths exist
ls $ARGUMENTS
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 147 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 5324fac6ac05
recipe-add-integration-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository shinpr/codex-workflows (37 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,553 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
debugging-e2e-tests
Use when an Opik E2E test has failed and a developer wants it investigated — e.g. "why did this e2e test fail?", "investigate the failing run on my PR", "is dataset-crud-smoke flaky?", "the nightly e2e suite went red". Takes a failure from a CI check, a TestOps launch, a test name, or a local run; gathers the trace…
langbot-testing
Test LangBot WebUI and core product flows with an automated browser and backend logs. Use when validating the configured LangBot frontend, pipeline Debug Chat, model provider setup and test buttons, bot and knowledge-base UI flows, or troubleshooting failed LangBot end-to-end tests.
chrome-cdp
Drive a headless Chrome over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) for browser QA — navigate, click, fill forms, read the DOM/accessibility tree, screenshot, and assert. Use whenever a task requires loading a web page and interacting with it like a user. Chrome is launched by a bash step (recipe below); this skill…
cli-testing
Manually test a running Vellum assistant end-to-end purely from the CLI — no desktop app or web UI. Hatch an instance, send messages, watch the reply, and tear it down. Use when verifying assistant behavior, reproducing a bug, or smoke-testing a change without the macOS/web clients.
browser-smoke-review
Use browser automation to review docs pages, preview URLs, rendered output, or web-facing fallow surfaces. Use when the user wants a screenshot-based review, browser smoke test, docs site check, or preview deployment inspection.
e2e
Run end-to-end tests via the CI workflow.