phpunit-integration-test-reviewing

phpunit-integration-test-reviewing is a skill for Claude Code from shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools. It costs 32 tokens per session (4,730 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An internal guide for reviewing Shopware PHPUnit integration tests against integration-test rules. PHPUnit is a PHP testing framework, and an integration test checks several real application parts working together.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it only when another skill or agent explicitly invokes it to review a Shopware integration test, optionally limited to named methods or class sections.
Why use it?
It keeps this review focused on integration-test conventions instead of broader test placement or migration decisions. It reports findings without changing files.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

Part of the test-writing plugin — 11 skills, 3 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it only when another skill or agent explicitly invokes it to review a Shopware integration test, optionally limited to named methods or class sections.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/shopwarelabs/ai-coding-tools/phpunit-integration-test-reviewing
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools --skill phpunit-integration-test-reviewing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install test-writing, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 11 skills, 3 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for phpunit-integration-test-reviewing

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shopwarelabs/ai-coding-tools/phpunit-integration-test-reviewing/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shopwarelabs/ai-coding-tools/phpunit-integration-test-reviewing)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shopwarelabs/ai-coding-tools/phpunit-integration-test-reviewing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shopwarelabs/ai-coding-tools/phpunit-integration-test-reviewing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for phpunit-integration-test-reviewing

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shopwarelabs/ai-coding-tools/phpunit-integration-test-reviewing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shopwarelabs/ai-coding-tools/phpunit-integration-test-reviewing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,730 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.04730
Opus 5.5 $0.00013 $0.01892
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00946
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00473

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 9029a0a42e25, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

phpunit-integration-test-reviewing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/test-writing/skills/phpunit-integration-test-reviewing/SKILL.md · 244 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 244 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

PHPUnit Integration Test Review

Review a Shopware PHPUnit integration test for compliance with integration testing conventions.

Overview

Review the test against the composed integration catalog — INTEGRATION-001 through INTEGRATION-008 together with every convention, design, isolation, and provider rule whose test-types declares integration — assuming it belongs in tests/integration/. Do NOT load the placement reasoning rules (group: placement) and do NOT decide whether the test should be migrated.

Input

  • {test_path} (required unless {digest} is set, which supplies the class shape instead) — Path to the integration test file.
  • {methods} (optional) — List of test method names to scope the review to. When omitted, the full class is reviewed.
  • {review_unit} (optional) — method, class-structure, class-bodies, or a list of these. When set, only rules whose minimal evaluation unit matches load. When omitted, all rules load. Orthogonal to {methods}.
  • {digest} (optional) — a pre-extracted, body-free structural digest of the test class. When set, review this text and skip reading the test file. Forces class-structure rules only. See Digest Mode.
  • {rules} (optional) — the pre-rendered rule catalog as text, provided in your prompt. When set, enter Inline-Rules Mode: select rules from this text instead of calling get_rules. When omitted, rules load via get_rules. See Inline-Rules Mode.
  • {baseline} (optional) — pass, fail, or unavailable: this file's test state before the review, supplied by the caller. Defaults to unavailable when omitted. Record and report it; this skill never executes tests to obtain it.

Workflow

digraph integration_review {
  "Review request" [shape=doublecircle];
  "digest set?" [shape=diamond];
  "Digest Mode: judge the digest text alone; force class-structure rules; read nothing from disk" [shape=box];
  "Phase 1: locate the file, verify tests/integration/, mirror the path onto src/ to identify the SUT, read the test file and its integration base" [shape=box];
  "in tests/integration/?" [shape=diamond];
  "STOP: FAILED - Not an integration test" [shape=octagon, style=filled, fillcolor=red];
  "named methods resolve?" [shape=diamond];
  "STOP: FAILED - No matching methods found" [shape=octagon, style=filled, fillcolor=red];
  "src/ directory resolved by mirroring?" [shape=diamond];
  "Phase 2: read the resolved src/ files, list their constructor dependencies, note the boundary interfaces INTEGRATION-002 allows mocking" [shape=box];
  "Source resolution failed: continue with INTEGRATION-002 degraded - flag every non-boundary mock without the SUT-collaborator cross-check, and state in the report that source resolution failed and which rule it affected" [shape=box];
  "Phase 3: build the rule filters - test_type=integration, no group, no test_category, scoped_review, review_unit" [shape=box];
  "rules set?" [shape=diamond];
  "Inline-Rules Mode: select from the inline composed catalog; never filter on Group or Categories; open no rule file" [shape=box];
  "Call get_rules with the filters this mode sets" [shape=box];
  "get_rules available?" [shape=diamond];
  "STOP: FAILED - test-rules MCP server not available; never fall back to hardcoded checks" [shape=octagon, style=filled, fillcolor=red];
  "Phase 4: apply each rule's detection algorithm against the scoped code, record violations, write suggested fixes; INTEGRATION-008 emits one informational hint per class and no further deliberation" [shape=box];
  "Phase 5: apply the baseline - fail forces ISSUES_FOUND" [shape=box];
  "Emit the report per references/output-format.md" [shape=doublecircle];

  "Review request" -> "digest set?";
  "digest set?" -> "Digest Mode: judge the digest text alone; force class-structure rules; read nothing from disk" [label="yes"];
  "digest set?" -> "Phase 1: locate the file, verify tests/integration/, mirror the path onto src/ to identify the SUT, read the test file and its integration base" [label="no"];
  "Digest Mode: judge the digest text alone; force class-structure rules; read nothing from disk" -> "rules set?";
  "Phase 1: locate the file, verify tests/integration/, mirror the path onto src/ to identify the SUT, read the test file and its integration base" -> "in tests/integration/?";
  "in tests/integration/?" -> "STOP: FAILED - Not an integration test" [label="no"];
  "in tests/integration/?" -> "named methods resolve?" [label="yes"];
  "named methods resolve?" -> "STOP: FAILED - No matching methods found" [label="none match"];
  "named methods resolve?" -> "src/ directory resolved by mirroring?" [label="some or all match, or methods unset - each unmatched name is a warning"];
  "src/ directory resolved by mirroring?" -> "Phase 2: read the resolved src/ files, list their constructor dependencies, note the boundary interfaces INTEGRATION-002 allows mocking" [label="yes"];
  "src/ directory resolved by mirroring?" -> "Source resolution failed: continue with INTEGRATION-002 degraded - flag every non-boundary mock without the SUT-collaborator cross-check, and state in the report that source resolution failed and which rule it affected" [label="no - walked up to the src/ root"];
  "Phase 2: read the resolved src/ files, list their constructor dependencies, note the boundary interfaces INTEGRATION-002 allows mocking" -> "Phase 3: build the rule filters - test_type=integration, no group, no test_category, scoped_review, review_unit";
  "Source resolution failed: continue with INTEGRATION-002 degraded - flag every non-boundary mock without the SUT-collaborator cross-check, and state in the report that source resolution failed and which rule it affected" -> "Phase 3: build the rule filters - test_type=integration, no group, no test_category, scoped_review, review_unit";
  "Phase 3: build the rule filters - test_type=integration, no group, no test_category, scoped_review, review_unit" -> "rules set?";
  "rules set?" -> "Inline-Rules Mode: select from the inline composed catalog; never filter on Group or Categories; open no rule file" [label="yes"];
  "rules set?" -> "Call get_rules with the filters this mode sets" [label="no"];
  "Inline-Rules Mode: select from the inline composed catalog; never filter on Group or Categories; open no rule file" -> "Phase 4: apply each rule's detection algorithm against the scoped code, record violations, write suggested fixes; INTEGRATION-008 emits one informational hint per class and no further deliberation";
  "Call get_rules with the filters this mode sets" -> "get_rules available?";
  "get_rules available?" -> "STOP: FAILED - test-rules MCP server not available; never fall back to hardcoded checks" [label="no"];
  "get_rules available?" -> "Phase 4: apply each rule's detection algorithm against the scoped code, record violations, write suggested fixes; INTEGRATION-008 emits one informational hint per class and no further deliberation";
  "Phase 4: apply each rule's detection algorithm against the scoped code, record violations, write suggested fixes; INTEGRATION-008 emits one informational hint per class and no further deliberation" -> "Phase 5: apply the baseline - fail forces ISSUES_FOUND";
  "Phase 5: apply the baseline - fail forces ISSUES_FOUND" -> "Emit the report per references/output-format.md";
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 244 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed 9029a0a42e25
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 44d0c017d6b2
  3. 1mo ago Changed 1c6538b5dd13
  4. 1mo ago Changed · +64 lines 883dd418d8dc
  5. 1mo ago First seen · 178 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 022e6b058ece

Subscribe to this mod's changes

phpunit-integration-test-reviewing is a skill published in the GitHub repository shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools (45 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 4,730 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

meta-skill-tester

A testing tool for checking the quality of coding-agent skills. It compares results with and without a skill, runs regression and chain tests, measures usage and time, and produces a scored report.

modu-ai/moai-cowork · 154 tokens

generate-file-name-gate

Emit the file-name gate into a consuming repository: a standalone bash checker plus its own test suite, with the casing rule, roots, and exemptions inlined from the resolved docs-naming configuration, and optionally the path-scoped rule file. The emitted pair carries no dependency on this plugin at run time. Refuses…

melodic-software/claude-code-plugins · 143 tokens

methodology

When the bundled claude-api skill resolves in this session, prefer its hillclimb for sweeping model and effort against an existing eval suite; this skill when the suite does not exist yet or its criteria are not yet measurable, before handing the suite to that search. Answers LLM-evaluation design questions from…

melodic-software/claude-code-plugins · 221 tokens

behavior-probes

Live probes of Claude Code permission, auto-mode, hook, worktree, subagent and sandbox behavior as cases with paired controls, each reported pass, fail or inconclusive with the Claude Code version; dry run by default, live runs opt-in and capped. Use when: 'rerun the behavior probes', 'does auto mode still deny this'…

melodic-software/claude-code-plugins · 84 tokens

benchmark-before-optimize

For performance work: measure before changing, profile to find bottlenecks, compare before and after.

jimmc414/claude-code-plugin-marketplace · 25 tokens

test-structural-invariants

For data structure validation: test lengths, relationships, constraints that must hold, verify setup is correct.

jimmc414/claude-code-plugin-marketplace · 27 tokens