Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add shqkel/agentic-coding --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shqkel/agentic-codingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shqkel/agentic-coding/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shqkel/agentic-coding/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shqkel/agentic-coding/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shqkel/agentic-coding/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shqkel/agentic-coding/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00340 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00136 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer Skill
이 스킬은 코드의 품질을 높이고 유지보수성을 강화하기 위한 전문적인 코드 리뷰 가이드를 제공합니다.
리뷰 핵심 원칙
- 가독성 (Readability): 변수명, 함수명이 그 역할을 명확히 설명하는가?
- 성능 (Performance): 불필요한 연산이나 중복된 데이터베이스 쿼리가 없는가?
- 보안 (Security): 민감 정보 노출, SQL Injection 등 보안 취약점이 없는가?
- 일관성 (Consistency): 프로젝트의 기존 코딩 스타일 및 컨벤션을 따르는가?
- 설계 (Design): 함수가 하나의 기능만 수행하며(SRP), 의존성 관리가 적절한가?
체크리스트 (참조용)
상세한 언어별/도메인별 체크리스트는 references/checklist.md를 참고하세요.
실행 가이드
- 변경된 코드(
git diff또는 파일 내용)를 분석합니다. - 각 원칙에 따라 개선이 필요한 부분을 식별합니다.
- 비판이 아닌 개선 제안(Suggestions) 형태로 피드백을 작성합니다.
- 가능한 경우 개선된 코드 예시를 함께 제공합니다.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 628a4607accc
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository shqkel/agentic-coding (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 340 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…