Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add shrekshrek/project-workflow/plugin install project-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shrekshrek/project-workflow/agents-md-revise)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shrekshrek/project-workflow/agents-md-revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shrekshrek/project-workflow/agents-md-revise.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00279 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00139 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
agents-md-revise scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agents.md Revise
Match the user's language. Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/docs/actions/agents-md-revise.md completely before acting; it owns the portable workflow and contract.
Claude execution details:
- Parse
$ARGUMENTSas an optional scope. Root/applicable nestedAGENTS.mdare the default; include.claude/rules/only when the user explicitly selects them. - Use Read/Grep/Glob/Bash for evidence. Missing
AGENTS.mdredirects to/project-workflow:project-personalize. - Use inline trace for sourced synchronization; dispatch a fresh
decision-completeness-auditoronly at its narrowed canonical boundary, with fallback under the shared execution contract. Blocking or unreliable audit evidence prevents apply. - Ask only for material ambiguity or new policy; do not reconfirm objective stale-value synchronization item by item.
- Run the canonical Guidance Placement audit and apply only evidence-backed placement changes.
- Apply only convention edits authorized by the current request or an explicit follow-up decision. Do not edit product specs, implementation code, or commit.
Report applied/skipped drift, evidence, applicable audit execution/results, and unresolved questions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 21 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 200d807e29e4
agents-md-revise is a skill published in the GitHub repository shrekshrek/project-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 279 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
improve
Autonomous quality improvement loop. Scores a target against a rubric, selects the highest-leverage axis, attacks it, verifies, documents, and loops. No pre-planning between iterations — each loop re-scores from scratch.
evolve
Research-driven multi-cycle improvement director. Forms causal hypotheses about why scores are low, validates them with scout agents before attacking, dispatches axis-parallel fleet attacks, extracts transferable patterns, and runs indefinitely within a budget envelope. Accumulates a persistent belief model and…
watch
File sentinel that monitors the working directory for changes and marker comments, then auto-triggers appropriate skills. Poll-based via git diff against the last scan commit. Writes intake items for batch processing and routes marker actions through /do. Use for automatic reactions to file changes; do NOT use for…
pr-watch
Local PR watcher. Monitors CI status, automatically fixes failing checks by reading failure logs and applying targeted fixes, then optionally merges when all checks pass. Local CLI analog to Claude Code's cloud auto-fix feature.
qa
Browser-based QA verification. Launches a real browser, navigates the app, clicks buttons, fills forms, and tests user flows. Works as a standalone skill or as a phase end condition in campaigns. Requires Playwright (optional dependency, graceful skip if not installed).
review
5-pass structured code review — correctness, security, performance, readability, consistency.